ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Unified meta regression models for rare variant association studies.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rare variant association studies (RVAS) of complex traits have emerged as a powerful approach to advance drug discovery and diagnostics. Missense pathogenicity predictions from AlphaMissense based on structural context and protein language models improve the differentiation between benign and deleterious variants. Constraint metrics, on the other hand, allow researchers to pinpoint genomic regions under selective pressure that may not directly impact protein structure, but are more likely to contain functionally important mutations. Loss-of-function (LoF) variants, which result in the complete or partial loss of protein function, are particularly informative, as it is more straightforward to assess their downstream functional consequences. In this study, we present a unified meta regression model approach that incorporates the probability of pathogenicity, probability of constraint, and indicator whether a variant is a predicted loss-of-function or missense variant as features to model the observed effect size and uncertainty of effect size obtained from single-variant genetic analysis. We applied the unified meta regression model to 1,144 continuous phenotypes from UK Biobank using single variant summary statistics obtained from Genebass. We replicated our findings using the AllofUS cohort. For each gene discovery, we make available a characterization of whether constrained sites are associated with the phenotype, whether pathogenic sites determined by structural based predictions are associated with phenotype, and whether broader loss-of-function or missense variant annotation better explains the summary statistics observed. Our results are publicly available at Global Biobank Engine (https://biobankengine.shinyapps.io/phenome-wide-unified-model/).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.