Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39896600›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Spatial Frequency Maps in Human Visual Cortex: A Replication and Extension.

Jiyeong Ha, William F Broderick, Kendrick Kay, Jonathan Winawer

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiyeong HaDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neural, New York University, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8687-0343
William F BroderickFlatiron Institute, Simons Foundation, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8999-9003
Kendrick KayCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6604-9155
Jonathan WinawerDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neural, New York University, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7475-5586

Funding

Linking brain and behavior 'around' the visual fieldR01EY027401 · NEI · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI CARRASCO, MARISA, WINAWER, JONATHAN A · 2017 to 2025
$2.9M
Deep sampling of cognitive effects in the human visual systemR01EY034118 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CLAYTON E CURTIS, Kendrick Norris Kay · 2023 to 2026
$1.9M
CRCNS: Integrating gray and white matter data to understand the organization of human visual cortexR01EY033628 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Noah C Benson, JONATHAN A WINAWER · 2021 to 2026
$1.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027401NEI NIH HHS R01 EY033628NEI NIH HHS R01 EY034118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a step toward developing a model of human primary visual cortex, a recent study introduced a model of spatial frequency tuning in V1 (Broderick, Simoncelli, & Winawer, 2022). The model is compact, using just 9 parameters to predict BOLD response amplitude for locations across all of V1 as a function of stimulus orientation and spatial frequency. Here we replicated this analysis in a new dataset, the 'nsdsynthetic' supplement to the Natural Scenes Dataset (Allen et al., 2022), to assess generalization of model parameters. Furthermore, we extended the analyses to extrastriate maps V2 and V3. For each retinotopic map in the 8 NSD subjects, we fit the 9-parameter model. Despite many experimental differences between NSD and the original study, including stimulus size, experimental design, and MR field strength, there was good agreement in most model parameters. The dependence of preferred spatial frequency on eccentricity in V1 was similar between NSD and Broderick et al. Moreover, the effect of absolute stimulus orientation on spatial frequency maps was similar: higher preferred spatial frequency for horizontal and cardinal orientations compared to vertical and oblique orientations in both studies. The extension to extrastriate maps revealed that the biggest change in tuning between maps was in bandwidth: the bandwidth in spatial frequency tuning increased by 70% from V1 to V2 and 100% from V1 to V3, paralleling known increases in receptive field size. Together, the results show robust reproducibility and bring us closer to a systematic characterization of spatial encoding in the human visual system.

Identifiers

PMID39896600
PMCPMC11785079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.