Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39896462›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Data-driven denoising in spinal cord fMRI with principal component analysis.

Kimberly J Hemmerling, Andrew D Vigotsky, Charlotte Glanville, Robert L Barry, Molly G Bright

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kimberly J HemmerlingDepartment of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9913-492X
Andrew D VigotskyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3166-0688
Charlotte GlanvilleDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, McCormick School of Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Robert L BarryAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA.
Molly G BrightDepartment of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7257-9646

Funding

Spinal cord functional connectivity as a biomarker of spinal cord dysfunctionR01EB027779 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BARRY, ROBERT L · 2019 to 2022
$2.7M
Graduate Training Program for Magnetic Resonance ImagingT32EB025766 · NIBIB · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Michael Markl · 2019 to 2026
$1.6M
Functional Imaging and resting state connectivity in human spinal cord at 7 TeslaR00EB016689 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BARRY, ROBERT L · 2016 to 2018
$747k
Causal connectivity along the spinal cord using high-resolution 7T fMRIR21EB031211 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BARRY, ROBERT L · 2021 to 2021
$462k
Investigation of Resting State Functional Connectivity in the Human Spinal CordR21NS081437 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI GORE, JOHN C · 2013 to 2014
$427k
Functional Imaging and Resting State Connectivity in Human Spinal Cord at 7 TeslaK99EB016689 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BARRY, ROBERT L · 2014 to 2015
$178k
Mapping Corticoreticulospinal Motor Control Using Brainstem and Spinal Cord fMRI in Chronic Hemiparetic StrokeR03HD113915 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BRIGHT, MOLLY G · 2024 to 2024
$160k
Probing an increased reliance on reticulospinal motor pathways in chronic hemiparetic stroke with advanced spinal cord functional MRIF31NS134222 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI HEMMERLING, KIMBERLY JIYUN · 2023 to 2024
$89k
Dopamine Dependence of Offset AnalgesiaF31NS126012 · NINDS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI VIGOTSKY, ANDREW · 2022 to 2023
$85k
NIBIB NIH HHS K99 EB016689NIBIB NIH HHS R00 EB016689NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027779NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB031211NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB025766NICHD NIH HHS R03 HD113915NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS126012NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS134222NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS081437
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous approaches have been used to denoise spinal cord functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. Principal component analysis (PCA)-based techniques, which derive regressors from a noise region of interest (ROI), have been used in both brain (e.g., CompCor) and spinal cord fMRI. However, spinal cord fMRI denoising methods have yet to be systematically evaluated. Here, we formalize and evaluate a PCA-based technique for deriving nuisance regressors for spinal cord fMRI analysis (SpinalCompCor). In this method, regressors are derived with PCA from a noise ROI, an area defined outside of the spinal cord and cerebrospinal fluid. A parallel analysis is used to systematically determine how many components to retain as regressors for modeling; this designated a median of 9 regressors across four fMRI datasets: motor task (n=26), breathing task (n=27), and resting state (n=15 and n=10). First-level fMRI modeling demonstrated that principal component regressors did fit noise (e.g., physiological noise from blood vessels), though the effectiveness may be dependent upon the acquisition parameters. However, group-level activation maps did not show a clear benefit from including SpinalCompCor regressors. The potential for collinearity of principal component regressors with the task may be a concern, and this should be considered in future implementations for which task-correlated noise is anticipated.

Indexed as

denoisingfunctional MRInuisance regressionphysiological noiseprincipal component analysisspinal cord

Identifiers

PMID39896462
PMCPMC11785179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.