ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
A comprehensive analysis and performance evaluation for osteoporosis prediction models.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An explainable machine learning model for predicting one-year osteoporosis risk: development and validation in a prospective cohort.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Stability-Driven Osteoporosis Screening: Multi-View Consensus Feature Selection with External Validation and Sensitivity Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical data analysis is an expanding area of study that holds the promise of transforming the healthcare landscape. The use of available data by researchers gives guidelines to improve health practitioners' decision-making capacity, thus enhancing patients' lives. The study looks at using deep learning techniques to predict the onset of osteoporosis from the NHANES 2017-2020 dataset that was preprocessed and arranged into SpineOsteo and FemurOsteo datasets. Two feature selection methods, namely mutual information (MI) and recursive feature elimination (RFE), were applied to sequential deep neural network models, convolutional neural network models, and recurrent neural network models. It can be concluded from the models that the mutual information method achieved higher accuracy than recursive feature elimination, and the MI feature selection CNN model showed better performance by showing 99.15% accuracy for the SpineOsteo dataset and 99.94% classification accuracy for the FemurOsteo dataset. Key findings of this study include family medical history, cases of fractures in patients and parental hip fractures, and regular use of medications like prednisone or cortisone. The research underscores the potential for deep learning in medical data processing, which eventually opens the way for enhanced models for diagnosis and prognosis based on non-image medical data. The implications of the study shall then be important for healthcare providers to be more informed in their decision-making processes for patients' outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.