ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
Improving long short-term memory (LSTM) networks for arbitrage spread forecasting: integrating cuckoo and zebra algorithms in chaotic mapping space for enhanced accuracy.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long short-term memory (LSTM) networks, widely used for financial time series forecasting, face challenges in arbitrage spread prediction, especially in hyperparameter tuning for large datasets. These issues affect model complexity and adaptability to market dynamics. Existing heuristic algorithms for LSTM often struggle to capture the complex dynamics of futures spread data, limiting prediction accuracy. We propose an integrated Cuckoo and Zebra Algorithms-optimised LSTM (ICS-LSTM) network for arbitrage spread prediction. This method replaces the Lévy flight in the Cuckoo algorithm with the Zebra algorithm search, improving convergence speed and solution optimization. Experimental results showed a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 0.011, mean square error (MSE) of 3.326, mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.267, and coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.996. The proposed model improved performance by reducing MAPE by 8.3-50.0%, MSE by 10.2-77.8%, and MAE by 9.3-63.0% compared to existing methods. These improvements translate to more accurate spread predictions, enhancing arbitrage opportunities and trading strategy profitability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.