ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
Usability and optimization of online apps in user's context.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The OptiFlow framework introduces a novel approach for enhancing usability evaluation and optimization known as OptiFlow. This framework combines heuristic evaluation with a web-based platform to provide a comprehensive method for assessing and optimizing user experiences in online applications. The architecture of OptiFlow incorporates key components, including the user, website, web service, and library, enabling seamless interaction and data exchange. A set of 240 usability guidelines, derived from a multidisciplinary expert collaboration, are systematically categorized into 15 usability categories, aligned with established design principles. Guidelines within OptiFlow are assigned implementation levels: "Green" for easily implementable guidelines, "Amber" for moderately complex ones, and "Red" for highly complex guidelines. These levels prioritize tasks based on complexity and feasibility. The framework's integration of guidelines into a structured SQL database simplifies implementation challenges, and the "execute" function systematically assesses website adherence to guidelines, resulting in True, False, or Null outcomes. Usability assessment outcomes are presented through categorized and prioritized data views for each implementation level, allowing stakeholders to address high-priority concerns efficiently. The OptiFlow framework represents an innovative approach to usability evaluation, fostering enriched user experiences and finely tuned digital interfaces. Future advancements may include additional rule types and the integration of advanced technologies for tackling intricate usability challenges. Ultimately, OptiFlow paves the way for proactive user experience enhancement and digital interface optimization in an ever-evolving digital landscape.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.