ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
Optimizing colorectal cancer segmentation with MobileViT-UNet and multi-criteria decision analysis.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Histopathology Segmentation for Resource-Constrained Healthcare Systems.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A hybrid framework for enhanced segmentation and classification of colorectal cancer histopathology.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer represents a significant health challenge as one of the deadliest forms of malignancy. Manual examination methods are subjective, leading to inconsistent interpretations among different examiners and compromising reliability. Additionally, process is time-consuming and labor-intensive, necessitating the development of computer-aided diagnostic systems. This study investigates the segmentation of colorectal cancer regions of normal tissue, polyps, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia, adenocarcinoma, and serrated Adenoma, using proposed segmentation models: VGG16-UNet, ResNet50-UNet, MobileNet-UNet, and MobileViT-UNet. This is the first study to integrate MobileViT as a UNet encoder. Each model was trained with two distinct loss functions, binary cross-entropy and dice loss, and evaluated using metrics including Dice ratio, Jaccard index, precision, and recall. The MobileViT-UNet+Dice loss emerged as the leading model in colorectal histopathology segmentation, consistently achieving high scores across all evaluation metrics. Specifically, it achieved a Dice ratio of 0.944 ± 0.030 and a Jaccard index of 0.897 ± 0.049, with precision at 0.955 ± 0.046 and Recall at 0.939 ± 0.038 across all classes. To further obtain the best performing model, we employed multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) using the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). This analysis revealed that the MobileViT-UNet+Dice model achieved the highest TOPSIS scores of 1, thereby attaining the highest ranking among all models. Our comparative analysis includes benchmarking with existing works, the results highlight that our best-performing model (MobileViT-UNet+Dice) significantly outperforms existing models, showcasing its potential to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of colorectal cancer segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.