Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39896372›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

Enhancing sentiment analysis of online comments: a novel approach integrating topic modeling and deep learning.

Yan Zhu, Rui Zhou, Gang Chen, Baili Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yan ZhuSchool of Design and Art, Shanghai Dianji University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
Rui ZhouSchool of Design and Art, Shanghai Dianji University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
Gang ChenInfrastructure Technology Business Group, Ant Group, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Baili ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional statistical learning-based sentiment analysis methods often struggle to effectively handle text relevance and temporality. To overcome these limitations, this paper proposes a novel approach integrating Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA), Shuffle-enhanced Real-Valued Non-Volume Preserving (RealNVP), a double-layer bidirectional improved Long Short-Term Memory (DBiLSTM) network, and a multi-head self-attention mechanism for sentiment analysis. LDA is employed to extract latent topics within comment texts, revealing text relevance and providing fine-grained user feedback. Shuffle enhancement is applied to RealNVP to effectively model the distribution of text topic features, enhancing performance while avoiding excessive complexity in model structure and computational overhead. The double-layer bidirectional improved LSTM, through the coupling of forget and input gates, captures the dynamic temporal changes in sentiment with greater flexibility. The multi-head self-attention mechanism enhances the model's ability to select and focus on key information, thereby more accurately reflecting user experiences. Experimental results on both Chinese and English online comment datasets demonstrate that the proposed integrated model achieves improved topic coherence compared to traditional LDA models, effectively mitigating overfitting. Furthermore, the model outperforms single models and other baselines in sentiment classification tasks, as evidenced by superior accuracy and F1 scores. These results underscore the model's effectiveness for both Chinese and English sentiment analysis in the context of online comments.

Indexed as

Double-Layer improved BiLSTMLDARealNVP with ShuffleSentiment analysisTemporalityText relevance

Identifiers

PMID39896372
PMCPMC11784723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.