Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39896364›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

Enhancing e-learning through AI: advanced techniques for optimizing student performance.

Rund Mahafdah, Seifeddine Bouallegue, Ridha Bouallegue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rund MahafdahInnov'COM Laboratory High School of Communications (Sup'COM), University of Carthage, Carthage, Tunisia.
Seifeddine BouallegueUniversity of Doha for Science and Technology, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0001-5338-2223
Ridha BouallegueInnov'COM Laboratory High School of Communications (Sup'COM), University of Carthage, Carthage, Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into e-learning has transformed conventional educational approaches, improving the learning process and maximizing student achievement. This study offers a thorough examination of how AI can be utilized to enhance e-learning results by employing advanced predictive methods and performance optimization strategies. The main goals consist of creating an AI-based framework to monitor and analyze student interactions, evaluating the influence of online learning platforms on student understanding using advanced algorithms, and determining the most efficient methods for blended learning systems. AI algorithms, known for their cognitive ability and capacity to learn, adapt, and make decisions, are employed to analyze and forecast student performance, thereby improving educational quality and outcomes. The practical results obtained by implementing machine learning and deep learning models, such as convolutional neural networks (CNN) and recurrent neural networks (RNN), show substantial enhancements in forecasting different performance metrics. This research highlights the ability of AI to develop adaptable, effective, and successful e-learning environments, promoting enhanced academic achievement and customized learning experiences. The findings demonstrate that CNN outperformed other deep learning and machine learning algorithms in terms of accuracy during the prediction phase, showcasing the advanced capabilities of AI in educational contexts. Portions of this text were previously published as part of a preprint (https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4724603/v1).

Indexed as

AIArtificial Intelligence (AI)Deep learningEducation dataeLearningMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39896364
PMCPMC11784796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.