ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024
AI in dermatology: a comprehensive review into skin cancer detection.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Multimodal observable cues in mood, anxiety, and borderline personality disorders: a review of reviews to inform explainable AI in mental health.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Pooled it
- A deep learning framework for recognizing skin changes secondary to chronic venous insufficiency in clinical photographs: a multicentre validation study.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Demographic Reporting and the Absence of Hispanic/Latino Representation in Dermatology Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2026Article
- Advances in the Field of Cutaneous Malignancies: Background and Clinical Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Validation of a Dermatology-Focused Multimodal Image-and-Data Assistant in Diagnosis and Management of Common Dermatologic Conditions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- DermaScanAI an explainable hybrid deep learning framework for automated skin lesion classification using dual attention and metadata fusion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Transformer-Based Foundation Learning for Robust and Data-Efficient Skin Disease Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrative Machine Learning of Genetic and Lifestyle Factors for Personalized Skin Health.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Generative Adversarial Networks in Dermatology: A Narrative Review of Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Review
- Training Primary Care Practitioners In Dermoscopy Diagnostic Algorithms Enhances Diagnostic Accuracy and Triage of Suspected Skin Cancer: Scoping Review Evidence.Dermatology practical & conceptual · 2025Review
- A Comprehensive Review of Azelaic Acid Pharmacological Properties, Clinical Applications, and Innovative Topical Formulations.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in modern clinical practice (Review).Medicine internationalReview
- An Update of AI and Radiomics in Precision Oncology: Insights from Liver Tumors as Case Models.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is significantly transforming dermatology, particularly in early skin cancer detection and diagnosis. This technological advancement addresses a crucial public health issue by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, efficiency, and accessibility. AI integration in medical imaging and diagnostic procedures offers promising solutions to the limitations of traditional methods, which often rely on subjective clinical evaluations and histopathological analyses. This study systematically reviews current AI applications in skin cancer classification, providing a comprehensive overview of their advantages, challenges, methodologies, and functionalities. Methodology: In this study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in the classification of skin cancer. We evaluated publications from three prominent journal databases: Scopus, IEEE, and MDPI. We conducted a thorough selection process using the PRISMA guidelines, collecting 1,156 scientific articles. Our methodology included evaluating the titles and abstracts and thoroughly examining the full text to determine their relevance and quality. Consequently, we included a total of 95 publications in the final study. We analyzed and categorized the articles based on four key dimensions: advantages, difficulties, methodologies, and functionalities. Results: AI-based models exhibit remarkable performance in skin cancer detection by leveraging advanced deep learning algorithms, image processing techniques, and feature extraction methods. The advantages of AI integration include significantly improved diagnostic accuracy, faster turnaround times, and increased accessibility to dermatological expertise, particularly benefiting underserved areas. However, several challenges remain, such as concerns over data privacy, complexities in integrating AI systems into existing workflows, and the need for large, high-quality datasets. AI-based methods for skin cancer detection, including CNNs, SVMs, and ensemble learning techniques, aim to improve lesion classification accuracy and increase early detection. AI systems enhance healthcare by enabling remote consultations, continuous patient monitoring, and supporting clinical decision-making, leading to more efficient care and better patient outcomes. Conclusions: This comprehensive review highlights the transformative potential of AI in dermatology, particularly in skin cancer detection and diagnosis. While AI technologies have significantly improved diagnostic accuracy, efficiency, and accessibility, several challenges remain. Future research should focus on ensuring data privacy, developing robust AI systems that can generalize across diverse populations, and creating large, high-quality datasets. Integrating AI tools into clinical workflows is critical to maximizing their utility and effectiveness. Continuous innovation and interdisciplinary collaboration will be essential for fully realizing the benefits of AI in skin cancer detection and diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.