Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39896334›Full record

ArticleTranslational animal science2025

Nutritional carryover effects of the previous plane of nutrition of crossbred Angus steers affects freshwater intake, animal performance, and water and feed efficiency.

Aghata Elins Moreira da Silva, Arturo Macias Franco, Felipe Henrique de Moura, Aaron Norris, Kelli Noelle Bangert, Leilson Rocha Bezerra, Lucas Gimenez Mota, Mozart Alves Fonseca

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Translational animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aghata Elins Moreira da SilvaDepartment of Agriculture, Veterinary, & Rangeland Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Arturo Macias FrancoDepartment of Agriculture, Veterinary, & Rangeland Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Felipe Henrique de MouraNutripura, Rondonópolis, MT 78705-600, Brazil.
Aaron NorrisDepartment of Natural Resources Management, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79430, USA.
Kelli Noelle BangertDepartment of Agriculture, Veterinary, & Rangeland Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.
Leilson Rocha BezerraFederal University of Campina Grande, Graduate Program in Animal and Health Sciences, Patos, Paraíba 58708110, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8815-3946
Lucas Gimenez MotaDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, Clayton Livestock Research Center, New Mexico State University, Clayton, NM 88415, USA.
Mozart Alves FonsecaDepartment of Agriculture, Veterinary, & Rangeland Sciences, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7393-9508

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated how the backgrounding diet can affect water intake, animal performance and water and feed efficiency of steers fed finishing diets based on grains or forages. Twenty-four crossbred Angus steers (298 ± 10.2 kg) were fed during backgrounding either a moderate (MP,

Indexed as

backgroundingfinishingnitrogenwater

Identifiers

PMID39896334
PMCPMC11786216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.