ArticleEnvironmental science and ecotechnology2025
Causal-inference machine learning reveals the drivers of China's 2022 ozone rebound.
Article in Environmental science and ecotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explaining building damage from wildfires in California.Science advances · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Environment and Human Health: Progress, Opportunities and Challenges.Current environmental health reports · 2025Review
- Understanding ozone variability in spatial responses to emissions and meteorology in China using interpretable machine learning.iScience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ground-level ozone concentrations rebounded significantly across China in 2022, challenging air quality management and public health. Identifying the drivers of this rebound is crucial for designing effective mitigation strategies. Commonly used methods, such as chemical transport models and machine learning, provide valuable insights but face limitations-chemical transport models are computationally intensive, while machine learning often fails to address confounding factors or establish causality. Here we show that elevated temperatures and increased solar radiation, as primary meteorological drivers, collectively account for 57 % of the total ozone increase, based on an integrated analysis of ground-based monitoring data, satellite observations, and meteorological reanalysis information using explainable machine learning and causal inference techniques. Compared to the year 2021, 90 % of the stations reported an increase in the Formaldehyde to Nitrogen ratio, implying a growing sensitivity of ozone formation to nitrogen oxide levels. These findings highlight the significant causal role of meteorological changes in the ozone rebound, urging the adoption of targeted ozone mitigation strategies under climate warming, particularly through varied regional strategies that consider existing anthropogenic emission levels and the prospective increase in biogenic volatile organic compounds. This identification of causal relationships in air pollution dynamics can support data-driven and accurate decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.