Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39896319›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmaceutical analysis2025

Application of artificial intelligence to quantitative structure-retention relationship calculations in chromatography.

Jingru Xie, Si Chen, Liang Zhao, Xin Dong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmaceutical analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jingru XieSchool of Medicine, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China.
Si ChenSchool of Medicine, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China.
Liang ZhaoSchool of Medicine, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China.
Xin DongSchool of Medicine, Shanghai University, Shanghai, 200444, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative structure-retention relationship (QSRR) is an important tool in chromatography. QSRR examines the correlation between molecular structures and their retention behaviors during chromatographic separation. This approach involves developing models for predicting the retention time (RT) of analytes, thereby accelerating method development and facilitating compound identification. In addition, QSRR can be used to study compound retention mechanisms and support drug screening efforts. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of QSRR workflows and applications, with a special focus on the role of artificial intelligence-an area not thoroughly explored in previous reviews. Moreover, we discuss current limitations in RT prediction and propose promising solutions. Overall, this review offers a fresh perspective on future QSRR research, encouraging the development of innovative strategies that enable the diverse applications of QSRR models in chromatographic analysis.

Indexed as

AccuracyChromatographyMachine learningQuantitative structure–retention relationship

Identifiers

PMID39896319
PMCPMC11782803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.