Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39896306›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of dermatology

Shedding New Light on Cutaneous Horns: A Comprehensive Review and Pitfall of Management.

Leo Wan, Aileen Park, Kamran Arastu, Amor Khachemoune

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of dermatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leo WanFrom the Medical Student, West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lewisburg, WV, USA.
Aileen ParkMedical Student, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Kamran ArastuMedical Student, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Amor KhachemouneDepartment of Dermatology, Brooklyn Campus of the VA NY Harbor Healthcare System, 800 Poly Place, Brooklyn, NY, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A cutaneous horn, also known as cornu cutaneum, is an uncommon protuberance of highly compacted keratinous material from the stratum corneum, resembling an animal horn. Although the cause and pathogenesis of these lesions were long misunderstood, cutaneous horns are now generally recognised to be reactive skin growths that can result from a variety of infectious, malignant, pre-malignant, and benign conditions. Most cutaneous horns are benign, but approximately 16%-20% are malignant, with squamous cell carcinoma being the most common malignant underlying aetiology. As the identification of the underlying aetiology necessitates microscopic examination of the base of the cutaneous horn, a major potential pitfall in the diagnosis and management of these lesions lies in the use of improper biopsy technique, which leads to inadequate sampling and failure to correctly identify the underlying aetiology of the lesion. This focused and up-to-date comprehensive review addresses the clinical presentations, epidemiology, aetiology/pathogenesis, histopathology, and differential diagnosis for cutaneous horns. In addition, we provide an overview of the many conditions that may underlie cutaneous horns and the management/treatment of cutaneous horns, including a discussion of proper excision/biopsy technique. Our review aims to enhance understanding and shed light on some of the potential pitfalls in the diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous horns, with the goal of improving outcomes for patients presenting with this condition.

Indexed as

Cornu cutaneumcutaneous horncutaneous horn biopsyexcisional biopsykeratotic horn

Identifiers

PMID39896306
PMCPMC11784970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.