Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39896284›Full record

ArticleMaterials today. Bio2025

In-vivo and ex-vivo evaluation of bio-inspired structures fabricated via PBF-LB for biomedical applications.

Miguel Araya, Antti Järvenpää, Timo Rautio, Rafael Vindas, Roberto Estrada, Mylène de Ruijter, Teodolito Guillén

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Miguel ArayaBio-inspired Processes and Materials Research Group, Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica, Cartago, 30101, Costa Rica.
Antti JärvenpääFuture Manufacturing Technologies Research Group, University of Oulu, Oulu, 90014, Finland.
Timo RautioFuture Manufacturing Technologies Research Group, University of Oulu, Oulu, 90014, Finland.
Rafael VindasSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, Heredia, 40104, Costa Rica.
Roberto EstradaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Costa Rica, Heredia, 40104, Costa Rica.
Mylène de RuijterDepartment of Orthopaedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, 3584, CX, the Netherlands.
Teodolito GuillénBio-inspired Processes and Materials Research Group, Instituto Tecnológico de Costa Rica, Cartago, 30101, Costa Rica.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Titanium-based lattice structures have gained significant attention in biomedical engineering due to their potential to mimic bone-like behavior and improve implant performance. This study evaluates the performance of bio-inspired Ti64 TPMS Gyroyd and Stochastic lattice structures fabricated via Powder Bed Fusion-Laser Beam (PBF-LB), focusing on their in-vivo and ex-vivo mechanical and biological responses for biomedical applications. Utilizing an SLM 280 HL printer, samples exhibited notable geometric accuracy essential for mechanical integrity. The study highlights significant mechanical properties and geometric precision improvements achieved through chemical etching. Mechanical characterization revealed that the as-built Gyroid lattice had the highest elastic modulus (3.64 GPa) and yield strength (200.65 MPa), which improved post-etching (3.62 GPa and 219.35 MPa, respectively). The Stochastic lattice demonstrated lower yield strength values post-etching (169.81 MPa). In-vivo analyses in horse models, both structures demonstrated excellent biocompatibility and osseointegration with no adverse inflammatory responses. Ex-vivo push-out tests showed that the chemically etched Gyroid structure achieved the highest resistance to push-out force (1645.407 N) and most significant displacement (2.754 mm), indicating superior energy absorption (4920.425 mJ). These findings underscore the critical influence of microstructural design and surface treatments on implant functionality, offering novel insights into improving biomedical implant performance through lattice architecture and post-processing.

Indexed as

BiocompatibilityBio-inspired materialsBiomedical implantsMechanical propertiesOsseointegrationPowder bed fusion-laser beam (PBF-LB)Ti64 lattice structures

Identifiers

PMID39896284
PMCPMC11783004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.