ArticleMaterials today. Bio2025
In-vivo and ex-vivo evaluation of bio-inspired structures fabricated via PBF-LB for biomedical applications.
Article in Materials today. Bio, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigation into the Impact of Hollow Cylinder Inner Diameter on the Mechanical Properties of Biomimetic Voronoi Scaffolds.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Special issue: Surface and interface engineering in biomedical applications: Harnessing nature's design.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Titanium-based lattice structures have gained significant attention in biomedical engineering due to their potential to mimic bone-like behavior and improve implant performance. This study evaluates the performance of bio-inspired Ti64 TPMS Gyroyd and Stochastic lattice structures fabricated via Powder Bed Fusion-Laser Beam (PBF-LB), focusing on their in-vivo and ex-vivo mechanical and biological responses for biomedical applications. Utilizing an SLM 280 HL printer, samples exhibited notable geometric accuracy essential for mechanical integrity. The study highlights significant mechanical properties and geometric precision improvements achieved through chemical etching. Mechanical characterization revealed that the as-built Gyroid lattice had the highest elastic modulus (3.64 GPa) and yield strength (200.65 MPa), which improved post-etching (3.62 GPa and 219.35 MPa, respectively). The Stochastic lattice demonstrated lower yield strength values post-etching (169.81 MPa). In-vivo analyses in horse models, both structures demonstrated excellent biocompatibility and osseointegration with no adverse inflammatory responses. Ex-vivo push-out tests showed that the chemically etched Gyroid structure achieved the highest resistance to push-out force (1645.407 N) and most significant displacement (2.754 mm), indicating superior energy absorption (4920.425 mJ). These findings underscore the critical influence of microstructural design and surface treatments on implant functionality, offering novel insights into improving biomedical implant performance through lattice architecture and post-processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.