ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2025
Bridging the gap: Enhancing pharmacist-physiscian collaboration through the provision of comprehensive medication reviews in community pharmacy.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physicians' Perspectives on Collaboration with Community Pharmacists: Implications for Collaborative Care in Jordan.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Willingness, Self-Perceived Barriers, and Practices of Pharmacists Toward Extended Pharmacy Services for Health Promotion: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Karachi, Pakistan.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Collaborative practice between physicians and pharmacists is particularly important in the provision of pharmacy services, such as Comprehensive Medication Reviews (CMR), which often require a close coordination between these professionals. Understanding the level and nature of this collaboration can assist in the development of strategies to enhance integrated care. Objectives: (1) To evaluate the changes in level of collaborative practice between community pharmacists and physicians in the context of a CMR service compared to usual practice, from the perspective of community pharmacists, and (2) to explore the determinants of such collaborative practice. Design: This research was conducted alongside a 12-months prospective longitudinal observational study. Methods: Community pharmacists providing CMR and pharmacists providing usual care (nCMR) from six provinces in Spain participated in the study. To measure the level of collaborative practice from the perspective of the community pharmacist, a previously validated tool was used. Collaborative practice was assessed at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. A multiple regression analysis was undertaken. Results: 323 pharmacists participated in the study. At the 12-month time point there were statistical differences between CMR and nCMR groups for all factors considered in the level of collaborative practice. Determinants which showed positive significant differences between groups included: rural location of the pharmacy, pharmacists being a pharmacy owner, and female gender of the physician. The age of the pharmacist was negatively associated with higher levels of collaborative practice. Conclusion: The study provides novel evidence on the level and nature of the collaborative practice between community pharmacists and physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.