Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39896126›Full record

ReviewJACC. CardioOncology2025

Cardiovascular Considerations After Cancer Therapy: Gaps in Evidence and

Anne Blaes, Anju Nohria, Saro Armenian, Carmen Bergom, Paaladinesh Thavendiranathan, Ana Barac, Gabriela Sanchez-Petitto, Sanjal Desai, Leah L Zullig, Alicia K Morgans and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JACC. CardioOncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Cancer Treatment-Related Cardiotoxicity among Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Comparative and Integrated View of Multiple Measures of Biological Age Acceleration.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anne BlaesDivision of Hematology/Oncology/Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Anju NohriaCardio-Oncology Program, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Saro ArmenianDepartment of Pediatrics, City of Hope, Duarte, California, USA.
Carmen BergomDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Paaladinesh ThavendiranathanTed Rogers Program in Cardiotoxicity Prevention, Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ana BaracInova Schar Heart and Vascular and Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Falls Church, Virginia, USA.
Gabriela Sanchez-PetittoDivision of Hematology/Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Sanjal DesaiDivision of Hematology/Oncology/Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Leah L ZulligDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Alicia K MorgansDana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Joerg HerrmannDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer survivors, particularly those treated with anthracyclines and chest radiation, face an elevated risk of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity. These complications affect not only physical health, but also life expectancy. Risk factors for cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity include age at which cancer treatment was received, the use of (potentially) cardiotoxic cancer therapies, and the presence of concomitant cardiovascular risk factors. Current guidelines provide recommendations for cardiovascular surveillance after cancer therapy, including type and frequency. All cancer survivors are advised to undergo annual clinical screenings and optimization of cardiovascular risk factors. Those at higher risk should undergo additional cardiovascular testing. This document aims to summarize the available evidence, present practical recommendations, and outline existent gaps in the current literature regarding cardiovascular care after cancer therapies.

Indexed as

5-fluorouracilanthracyclinebiomarkerscancer survivorshipcardio-oncologycardiotoxicitycoronary artery diseaseechocardiographyguidelinesheart FailureHer2 Therapyoutcomesscientific statementstyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID39896126
PMCPMC11782100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.