ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2025
Resistance to FLT3 inhibitors involves different molecular mechanisms and reduces new DNA synthesis.
Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Overcoming the sorafenib resistance mechanism in FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: molecular basis and new targets.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is a hard to treat blood cancer. Mutations in FLT3 are common among the genetic aberrations that characterise the cancer. Patients initially react to FLT3 inhibitors but drug resistance is a hinder to successful therapy. To better understand the mechanisms leading to drug resistance, we generated four AML cell lines resistant to the inhibitors gilteritinib or FF-10101, and explored their resistance mechanisms. We further tested whether the novel inhibitor Chen-9u could be used to limit cell growth. The results showed that each of the four resistant cell lines became resistant through a different mechanism. Resistant cells showed decreased FLT3 and increased NRAS pathway activity and reduced DNA synthesis due to decrease in CDK4 activity. Resistance mechanisms included resistance mutations in FLT3 (C695F and N701K), and a novel mutation in NRAS (G12C). In a fourth line, resistance might have developed through a MYCN mutation. Cell growth was inhibited by Chen-9u and resistant clones could not be obtained with this inhibitor. The results highlight opportunities and limitations. On the one hand, resistant cells were produced due to different mechanisms, showing the versatility of tumour cells. Furthermore, resistance developed to the most advanced inhibitors, one of which is covalent and the other non-covalent but highly specific. On the other hand, it is shown that DNA synthesis is reduced, which means that resistance has evolutionary consequences. Finally, the novel drug-resistant cell lines may serve as useful models for better understanding of the cellular events associated with inherent and acquired drug resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.