ArticleBone reports2025
A simple and user-friendly machine learning model to detect osteoporosis in health examination populations in Southern Taiwan.
Article in Bone reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of the Dietary Index for Gut Microbiota with site-specific Osteoporosis: Insights from machine learning applied to a national population.Metabolism open · 2026Article
- Nomogram for Osteoporosis Risk Using LDCT Trabecular Parameters.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Machine learning model integrating oral microbiota and clinical features for predicting osteoporosis and bone loss in high-altitude populations.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Identification of key predictors of postmenopausal osteoporosis from routine clinical indicators using explainable machine learning.PloS one · 2026Article
- Taiwan's Smart Healthcare Value Chain: AI Innovation from R&D to Industry Deployment.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Response to "Artificial Intelligence Combined With Chest Radiography: New Hope for the Opportunistic Screening for Osteoporosis".Korean journal of radiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Osteoporosis is a growing public health concern in aging populations such as Taiwan, where limited utilization of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) often leads to underdiagnosis and even delayed treatment. Therefore, we leveraged machine learning (ML) and aimed to develop a simple and easily accessible model that effectively identifies individuals at high risk of osteoporosis. Methods: This retrospective analysis enrolled 5510 men aged ≥50 years and 4720 postmenopausal women who underwent DXA at the Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, with another cohort of 610 men and 523 women for validation. We developed separate models for men and women using decision trees, random forests, support vector machines, k-nearest neighbors, extreme gradient boosting, and artificial neural networks (ANNs) to predict osteoporosis. Furthermore, we compared each model with the traditional Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) model. Results: We identified age, height, weight, and BMI as variables for our prediction model and evaluated the model's performance using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The ANN model significantly outperformed the OSTA model and all the other ML models for both men and women (AUC: 0.67 for men; 0.77 for women). The validation data for the ANN model showed similar AUCs for both men and women. Conclusion: This study developed ML models to help identify individuals at high risk of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men aged ≥50 years in southern Taiwan. Our ML models, especially the ANN model, surpassed the OSTA model and consistently performed well across different populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.