ArticleReproductive medicine and biology
"Shortening time to pregnancy in infertile women by personalizing treatment of microbial imbalance through Emma & Alice: A multicenter prospective study".
Article in Reproductive medicine and biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidimensional regulatory architecture of endometrial receptivity and its translational implications for implantation failure.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- An Unusual Case of Unexplained Infertility: Co-colonization of the Uterus and Seminal Fluid.Cureus · 2026Article
- International Expert Consensus Statement on Chronic Endometritis: A Comprehensive Literature Review and Modified e-Delphi Study.Reproductive medicine and biologyReview
- "Shortening time to pregnancy in infertile women by personalizing treatment of microbial imbalance through Emma & Alice: A multicenter prospective study".Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
- Endometrial Microbiome and Implantation: From Basic Knowledge to Clinical Medicine.Reproductive medicine and biologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the impact of Endometrial Microbiome Metagenomic Analysis and Analysis of Infectious Chronic Endometritis (EMMA & ALICE) on pregnancy outcomes following recommended treatments in women with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) or recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Methods: This prospective, multicenter cohort study included 527 women under 42 years old with RIF or RPL across 14 IVF centers in Japan. Endometrial samples were analyzed using EMMA & ALICE, and patients received antibiotics, probiotics, or no treatment based on test results. Pregnancy outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariate generalized linear models. Results: Amongst participants, 43.4% had a normal Lactobacillus-dominated microbiota, 20.9% had dysbiosis, and 35.7% had mild dysbiosis or ultralow biomass. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed significantly higher ongoing pregnancy rates in the dysbiosis group treated with antibiotics and probiotics compared to other groups ( Conclusions: EMMA & ALICE-guided antimicrobial and probiotic treatments improved pregnancy outcomes, enabling the dysbiosis group to achieve pregnancy earlier than the normal group. Addressing uterine dysbiosis may reduce the time to pregnancy in patients with RIF and RPL. Trial registration: University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN), UMIN000036917.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.