Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39896090›Full record

ArticleAsian bioethics review2025

The Current State and Challenges of Clinical Ethics Consultation for Prenatal Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study of Committee Employee Perspectives in China.

Ying Wu, Tianchi Hao, Xing Liu, Xin Zhang, Yuqiong Zhong, Dan Luo, Xiaomin Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian bioethics review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ying WuSchool of Humanities, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan China.
Tianchi HaoSchool of Humanities, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan China.
Xing LiuMedical Ethics Committee, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan China.
Xin ZhangMedical Humanities Research Center, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan China.
Yuqiong ZhongSchool of Humanities, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan China.
Dan LuoDepartment of Social Medicine and Health Management, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan China.
Xiaomin WangCenter for Clinical Pharmacology, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan China.ORCID 0000-0002-5380-1501

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical ethics consultations (CECs) play an important role in resolving ethical issues in clinical practice worldwide. The government has encouraged the development of CECs in China to address the ethical challenges arising in prenatal diagnosis. So far, the current state and challenges facing CEC remain understudied. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of employees on ethics committees for prenatal diagnosis in 13 medical institutions in Hunan Province, China. Twenty-eight employees participated in interviews. Our qualitative approach employed content analysis to identify major themes in interviewees' responses, which covered the composition and vision of their prenatal diagnosis ethics committee, as well as the challenges they faced. The results show that CEC in China is in an exploratory stage, with models for CEC composition, and workflow varying significantly. Therefore, we propose the future direction of efforts to improve CECs, including improving CEC working mechanisms and operating procedures, strengthening ethical training for healthcare workers and ethics committee employees, and developing more specific ethical guidance based on the accumulated experiences of ethics committee employees in the early development of CEC for prenatal diagnosis.

Indexed as

Clinical ethicsClinical ethics consultationEthics committeePrenatal diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID39896090
PMCPMC11785870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.