ArticleAmerican journal of preventive cardiology2025
Biomarkers of residual risk and all-cause mortality after acute coronary syndrome.
Article in American journal of preventive cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of the novel remnant cholesterol inflammatory index with acute coronary syndrome risk in hospitalized patients with diabetes: a two-center study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The Synergistic Risk of Insulin Resistance and Renal Dysfunction in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Article
- Mechanistic insights into the multi-target anti-atherosclerotic actions of rhubarb: a traditional remedy revisited.Chinese medicine · 2025Review
- Plasma Dickkopf-1 Levels Are Associated with Chronic Kidney Disease.Metabolites · 2025Article
- Significance of Residual Inflammatory Risk and Persistent Inflammation in Patients with Myocardial Infarction with Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adverse cardiovascular events often recur after acute coronary syndrome (ACS), despite secondary prevention measures. Residual risk involves various inflammatory, metabolic and renal factors as well as lipid and thrombotic processes. This cohort study investigates the relationship between four risk biomarkers at 1 month after ACS and all-cause death within 3 years in patients treated with early invasive strategy and high-intensity statins from admission. Methods: Levels of residual risk for the biomarkers were: low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥ 70 mg/dl; high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hs-CRP) ≥ 2 mg/l; glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 7% in diabetic and ≥ 5.7% in non-diabetic patients; decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 25% compared to baseline. The association between the four biomarkers and all-cause death within 3 years was evaluated with Cox proportional analysis. Results: This study included 1099 patients (68±12 years; 70.3% males). At 1 month the majority of patients had levels of LDL-C, hs-CRP and/or HbA1c above the risk cut-points, and only 7% of cases presented reduced eGFR. Reduced eGFR and hs-CRP ≥ 2 mg/l at 1 month were the sole independent biomarker predictors of 3-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratios 3.03 and 2.66, respectively). Conclusions: In this population on high-intensity statin therapy only hsCRP and eGFR were independently associated with medium-term mortality. Diversification of secondary preventive measures based on routine evaluations of inflammation and kidney function markers, not only LDL-C, could lead to better targeted reduction of residual risk after ACS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.