ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Blockchain enabled policy-based access control mechanism to restrict unauthorized access to electronic health records.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Access Control Development Within the Framework of an IOTA-Based Electronic Medical Record Management System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- WiraChain: a blockchain and FHIR-based platform for improving clinical data interoperability in healthcare.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electronic health record transmission and storage involve sensitive information, requiring robust security measures to ensure access is limited to authorized personnel. In the existing state of the art, there is a growing need for efficient access control approaches for the secure accessibility of patient health data by sustainable electronic health records. Locking medical data in a healthcare center forms information isolation; thus, setting up healthcare data exchange platforms is a driving force behind electronic healthcare centers. The healthcare entities access rights like subject, controller, and requester are defined and regulated by access control policies as defined by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). In this work, we have introduced a blend of policy-based access control (PBAC) system backed by blockchain technology, where smart contracts govern the intrinsic part of security and privacy. As a result, any Subject can know at any time who currently has the right to access his data. The PBAC grants access to electronic health records based on predefined policies. Our proposed PBAC approach employs policies in which the subject, controller, and requester can grant access, revoke access, and check logs and actions made in a particular healthcare system. Smart contracts dynamically enforce access control policies and manage access permissions, ensuring that sensitive data is available only to authorized users. Delineating the proposed access control system and comparing it to other systems demonstrates that our approach is more adaptable to various healthcare data protection scenarios where there is a need to share sensitive data simultaneously and a robust need to safeguard the rights of the involved entities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.