Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39896036›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Blockchain enabled policy-based access control mechanism to restrict unauthorized access to electronic health records.

Nadeem Yaqub, Jianbiao Zhang, Muhammad Irfan Khalid, Weiru Wang, Markus Helfert, Mansoor Ahmed, Jungsuk Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nadeem YaqubDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Jianbiao ZhangDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Muhammad Irfan KhalidDepartment of Information Technology, University of Sialkot, Sialkot, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-6643-6558
Weiru WangDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China.
Markus HelfertADAPT Centre, Innovative Value Institute, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.
Mansoor AhmedADAPT Centre, Innovative Value Institute, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2034-1403
Jungsuk KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5866-465X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic health record transmission and storage involve sensitive information, requiring robust security measures to ensure access is limited to authorized personnel. In the existing state of the art, there is a growing need for efficient access control approaches for the secure accessibility of patient health data by sustainable electronic health records. Locking medical data in a healthcare center forms information isolation; thus, setting up healthcare data exchange platforms is a driving force behind electronic healthcare centers. The healthcare entities access rights like subject, controller, and requester are defined and regulated by access control policies as defined by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). In this work, we have introduced a blend of policy-based access control (PBAC) system backed by blockchain technology, where smart contracts govern the intrinsic part of security and privacy. As a result, any Subject can know at any time who currently has the right to access his data. The PBAC grants access to electronic health records based on predefined policies. Our proposed PBAC approach employs policies in which the subject, controller, and requester can grant access, revoke access, and check logs and actions made in a particular healthcare system. Smart contracts dynamically enforce access control policies and manage access permissions, ensuring that sensitive data is available only to authorized users. Delineating the proposed access control system and comparing it to other systems demonstrates that our approach is more adaptable to various healthcare data protection scenarios where there is a need to share sensitive data simultaneously and a robust need to safeguard the rights of the involved entities.

Indexed as

Access controlConsent managementElectronic health recordEthereum solidityGDPR complianceHealthcare data sharingPermissionless blockchainPolicy based access controlSecurity and privacySmart contract

Identifiers

PMID39896036
PMCPMC11784709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.