Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39896031›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

Process mining applications in healthcare: a systematic literature review.

Lerina Aversano, Martina Iammarino, Antonella Madau, Giuseppe Pirlo, Gianfranco Semeraro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lerina AversanoDepartment of Agricultural Science, Food, Natural Resources and Engineering, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2436-6835
Martina IammarinoDepartment of Information Science and Technology, Pegaso University, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8025-733X
Antonella MadauDepartment of Engineering, University of Sannio, Benevento, Italy.
Giuseppe PirloDepartment of Computer Science, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Gianfranco SemeraroDepartment of Science Technology and Society, University School for Advanced Studies IUSS Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1666-8323

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Process mining applications in healthcare is a field widely investigated in the last years. Its diffusion is driven by increasing digitalization and the availability of large quantities of clinical data, enabling hospitals, clinics, and other healthcare organizations to optimize workflows, reduce operational costs, and improve asset management. The importance of process mining lies in its potential to identify inefficiencies in processes, standardize clinical practices, support evidence-based decisions and, in general, improve the quality of care provided. The article aims to systematically review the research landscape in the field of process mining in healthcare, providing an in-depth understanding of how process mining is applied in healthcare. It contributes to the existing literature by highlighting the following aspects: the specific research topics covered (i), the extent of use of various process mining algorithms in different healthcare applications, showing their adaptability and effectiveness in specific contexts (ii), and, finally, the types and characteristics of data employed in these studies, highlighting the needs and challenges related to data in healthcare process mining (iii). Through this systematic literature review, the article can support researchers in identifying the most valuable research topic to be explored by the scientific community working on process mining in healthcare. To achieve this goal, several articles focusing on the algorithms and data employed were selected and analyzed. The final discussion highlights current research gaps, suggesting future areas of investigation, and identifies critical issues and vulnerabilities of existing process mining applications in healthcare.

Indexed as

HealthcareProcess miningSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39896031
PMCPMC11784703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.