ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Prediabetes risk classification algorithm
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes is a disease that affects millions of people in the world and its early screening prevents serious health problems, also providing relief in the demand for healthcare services. In the search for methods to support early diagnosis, this article introduces a novel prediabetes risk classification algorithm (PRCA) for type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), utilizing the chemosensitivity of carotid bodies (CB) and K-means clustering technique from the field of machine learning. Heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) data from eight volunteers with prediabetes and 25 without prediabetes were analyzed. Data were collected in basal conditions and after stimulation of the CBs by inhalation of 100% of oxygen and after ingestion of a standardized meal. During the analysis, a greater variability of groups was observed in people with prediabetes compared to the control group, particularly after inhalation of oxygen. The algorithm developed from these results showed an accuracy of 86% in classifying for prediabetes. This approach, centered on CB chemosensitivity deregulation in early disease stages, offers a nuanced detection method beyond conventional techniques. Moreover, the adaptable algorithm and clustering methodology hold promise as risk classifications for other diseases. Future endeavors aim to validate the algorithm through longitudinal studies tracking disease development among volunteers and expand the study's scope to include a larger participant pool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.