ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
A hybrid blockchain-based solution for secure sharing of electronic medical record data.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Towards Electronic Medical Record (EMR) utilization in developing countries: a conceptual model based on systematic literature review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient privacy data security is a pivotal area of research within the burgeoning field of smart healthcare. This study proposes an innovative hybrid blockchain-based framework for the secure sharing of electronic medical record (EMR) data. Unlike traditional privacy protection schemes, our approach employs a novel tripartite blockchain architecture that segregates healthcare data across distinct blockchains for patients and healthcare providers while introducing a separate social blockchain to enable privacy-preserving data sharing with authorized external entities. This structure enhances both security and transparency while fostering collaborative efforts across different stakeholders. To address the inherent complexity of managing multiple blockchains, a unique cross-chain signature algorithm is introduced, based on the Boneh-Lynn-Shacham (BLS) signature aggregation technique. This algorithm not only streamlines the signature process across chains but also strengthens system security and optimizes storage efficiency, addressing a key challenge in multi-chain systems. Additionally, our external sharing algorithm resolves the prevalent issue of medical data silos by facilitating better data categorization and enabling selective, secure external sharing through the social blockchain. Security analyses and experimental results demonstrate that the proposed scheme offers superior security, storage optimization, and flexibility compared to existing solutions, making it a robust choice for safeguarding patient data in smart healthcare environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.