ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025
Secure software development: leveraging application call graphs to detect security vulnerabilities.
Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The inconsistency in software development standards frequently leads to vulnerabilities that can jeopardize an application's cryptographic integrity. This situation can result in incomplete or flawed encryption processes. Vulnerabilities may manifest as missing, bypassed, or improperly executed encryption functions or the absence of critical cryptographic mechanisms, which eventually weaken security goals. This article introduces a thorough method for detecting vulnerabilities using dynamic and static analysis, focusing on a cryptographic function dominance tree. This strategy systematically minimizes the likelihood of integrity breaches in cryptographic applications. A layered and modular model is developed to maintain integrity by mapping the entire flow of cryptographic function calls across various components. The cryptographic function call graph and dominance tree are extracted and subsequently analyzed using an integrated dynamic and static technique. The extracted information undergoes strict evaluation against the anticipated function call sequence in the relevant cryptographic module to identify and localize potential security issues. Experimental findings demonstrate that the proposed method considerably enhances the accuracy and comprehensiveness of vulnerability detection in cryptographic applications, improving implementation security and resilience against misuse vulnerabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.