Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39896014›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2025

A comparative study of the performance of ten metaheuristic algorithms for parameter estimation of solar photovoltaic models.

Adel Zga, Farouq Zitouni, Saad Harous, Karam Sallam, Abdulaziz S Almazyad, Guojiang Xiong, Ali Wagdy Mohamed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adel ZgaDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology, Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology, Kasdi Merbah University, Ouargla, Algeria.
Farouq ZitouniDepartment of Computer Science and Information Technology, Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology, Kasdi Merbah University, Ouargla, Algeria.ORCID 0000-0003-2566-1457
Saad HarousDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computing and Informatics, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0001-6524-7352
Karam SallamDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computing and Informatics, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Abdulaziz S AlmazyadDepartment of Computer Engineering, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Guojiang XiongGuizhou Key Laboratory of Intelligent Technology in Power System, College of Electrical Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China.
Ali Wagdy MohamedOperations Research Department, Faculty of Graduate Studies for Statistical Research, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study conducts a comparative analysis of the performance of ten novel and well-performing metaheuristic algorithms for parameter estimation of solar photovoltaic models. This optimization problem involves accurately identifying parameters that reflect the complex and nonlinear behaviours of photovoltaic cells affected by changing environmental conditions and material inconsistencies. This estimation is challenging due to computational complexity and the risk of optimization errors, which can hinder reliable performance predictions. The algorithms evaluated include the Crayfish Optimization Algorithm, the Golf Optimization Algorithm, the Coati Optimization Algorithm, the Crested Porcupine Optimizer, the Growth Optimizer, the Artificial Protozoa Optimizer, the Secretary Bird Optimization Algorithm, the Mother Optimization Algorithm, the Election Optimizer Algorithm, and the Technical and Vocational Education and Training-Based Optimizer. These algorithms are applied to solve four well-established photovoltaic models: the single-diode model, the double-diode model, the triple-diode model, and different photovoltaic module models. The study focuses on key performance metrics such as execution time, number of function evaluations, and solution optimality. The results reveal significant differences in the efficiency and accuracy of the algorithms, with some algorithms demonstrating superior performance in specific models. The Friedman test was utilized to rank the performance of the various algorithms, revealing the Growth Optimizer as the top performer across all the considered models. This optimizer achieved a root mean square error of 9.8602187789E-04 for the single-diode model, 9.8248487610E-04 for both the double-diode and triple-diode models and 1.2307306856E-02 for the photovoltaic module model. This consistent success indicates that the Growth Optimizer is a strong contender for future enhancements aimed at further boosting its efficiency and effectiveness. Its current performance suggests significant potential for improvement, making it a promising focus for ongoing development efforts. The findings contribute to the understanding of the applicability and performance of metaheuristic algorithms in renewable energy systems, providing valuable insights for optimizing photovoltaic models.

Indexed as

Double-diode modelMetaheuristicsParameter estimationPhotovoltaic module modelSingle-diode modelSolar photovoltaic modelsTriple-diode model

Identifiers

PMID39896014
PMCPMC11784897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.