ReviewPeerJ. Computer science2025
A review of deep learning in blink detection.
Review in PeerJ. Computer science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A scoping review of integrated blink analysis technologies for ocular surface diseases.Eye (London, England) · 2026Review
- Emergent blink rate in early childhood is associated with neural origins of executive function.Communications psychology · 2026Article
- BlinkNet-Q: A Deep Learning-Based Software for Real-Time Blink Rate Quantification and Incomplete-Blink Pattern Recognition.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Review
- The method for quantified analysis and pattern visualization for eye blinking using high-frame-rate video.Biomedical engineering letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blink detection is a highly concerned research direction in the field of computer vision, which plays a key role in various application scenes such as human-computer interaction, fatigue detection and emotion perception. In recent years, with the rapid development of deep learning, the application of deep learning techniques for precise blink detection has emerged as a significant area of interest among researchers. Compared with traditional methods, the blink detection method based on deep learning offers superior feature learning ability and higher detection accuracy. However, the current research on blink detection based on deep learning lacks systematic summarization and comparison. Therefore, the aim of this article is to comprehensively review the research progress in deep learning-based blink detection methods and help researchers to have a clear understanding of the various approaches in this field. This article analyzes the progress made by several classical deep learning models in practical applications of eye blink detection while highlighting their respective strengths and weaknesses. Furthermore, it provides a comprehensive summary of commonly used datasets and evaluation metrics for blink detection. Finally, it discusses the challenges and future directions of deep learning for blink detection applications. Our analysis reveals that deep learning-based blink detection methods demonstrate strong performance in detection. However, they encounter several challenges, including training data imbalance, complex environment interference, real-time processing issues and application device limitations. By overcoming the challenges identified in this study, the application prospects of deep learning-based blink detection algorithms will be significantly enhanced.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.