Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39895992›Full record

ReviewResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025

Adeno-associated virus-based gene therapy for hemophilia-addressing the gaps.

Wolfgang Miesbach, Paul Batty, Pratima Chowdary, Sylvia Fong, Radoslaw Kaczmarek, Frank W G Leebeek, Brian Long, Johnny Mahlangu, Mike Makris, Glenn F Pierce and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Overview of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Haemophilia Gene Therapy.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Malignancy and gene therapy in hemophilia.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026
    Article
  6. Qualification Criteria of Gene Therapy for Haemophilia-Opinion of the EAHAD Gene Therapy Working Group.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2025
    Article
  7. Why is the uptake of gene therapy in hemophilia less than expected?Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Defining the Role of Nurses in Gene Therapy for Haemophilia.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Wolfgang MiesbachMedical Clinic 2, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
Paul BattyDepartment of Haematology, Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Pratima ChowdaryKatharine Dormandy Haemophilia and Thrombosis Centre, Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Sylvia FongQueen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Radoslaw KaczmarekHerman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Frank W G LeebeekDepartment of Haematology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Brian Long4D Molecular Therapeutics, Emeryville, California, USA.
Johnny MahlanguDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Haematology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Mike MakrisSchool of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Glenn F PierceWorf Federation of Hemophilia, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Steven W PipeUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Alok SrivastavaSt. John's Research Institute, St. John's Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, India.
Jan VoorbergSanquin Research, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Flora PeyvandiFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adeno-associated virus-based gene therapy for hemophilia has emerged as a revolutionary treatment option, offering potential correction of clotting factor deficiency through a single intravenous infusion of functional genes directed to hepatocytes. With 3 gene therapies recently approved, this approach shows promise in transforming the lives of individuals with hemophilia. However, the complexity of gene therapy and the lack of standardization of methods in different components of this therapy can lead to unique challenges for clinical implementation. This manuscript follows literature reviews and structured discussions by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Scientific and Standardization Committee Working Group on Gene Therapy that identified specific areas requiring standardization of methods, including viral vector production, liver function assessment, quantification of factor (F)VIII and FIX expression levels, assessment of antiadeno-associated viral antibodies, and genomic integration detection methods. Standardization strategies aim to achieve consistent vector quality, effective patient selection, and uniform assessment methods by implementing advanced laboratory techniques and standardized protocols. Standardizing these parameters is essential for improving the understanding of short-term and long-term safety and efficacy of gene therapy in hemophilia. This effort aims to enhance the predictability of individual responses, address variability in outcomes, and ultimately provide more effective, safer, and personalized treatment options for individuals with hemophilia.

Indexed as

gene therapyhemophiliamethodssafetystandardization

Identifiers

PMID39895992
PMCPMC11787635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.