Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39895954›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2024

Impact of elective nodal irradiation ≥ 60 Gy on severe weight loss during intensity-modulated radiation therapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Kenji Makita, Yasushi Hamamoto, Hiromitsu Kanzaki, Kei Nagasaki, Noriko Takata, Shintaro Tsuruoka, Kotaro Uwatsu, Sohei Mitani, Naohito Hato, Teruhito Kido

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kenji MakitaDepartment of Radiology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Ehime, Japan.
Yasushi HamamotoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan.
Hiromitsu KanzakiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan.
Kei NagasakiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan.
Noriko TakataDepartment of Radiology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Ehime, Japan.
Shintaro TsuruokaDepartment of Radiology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Ehime, Japan.
Kotaro UwatsuDepartment of Radiology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Ehime, Japan.
Sohei MitaniDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Ehime, Japan.
Naohito HatoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Ehime, Japan.
Teruhito KidoDepartment of Radiology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon, Ehime, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to investigate the association between radiotherapy-related factors and the incidence of severe weight loss (WL) during radiotherapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) era. Materials and methods: Seventy-nine patients with HNSCC who received IMRT between January 2011 and December 2020 were reviewed. The 10% WL was defined as severe WL. The median prescribed doses of IMRT were 70 Gy for the high-risk planning target volume (HRPTV); 60 Gy for the intermediate-risk planning target volume (IRPTV); 54 Gy for the low-risk PTV. Results: Larger volumes of ≥ 60 Gy (PTV60Gy) had a significant impact on WL, whereas volumes of ≥ 70 Gy and ≥ 54 Gy did not. PTV60Gy to the ipsilateral level II or III necks had a significant impact on WL, whereas PTV60Gy to the ipsilateral levels I, IV, V, or VII did not. The primary site of the nasopharynx/oropharynx had a significant impact on WL, whereas the hypopharynx/larynx did not. In the stepwise regression and multivariate analyses, primary site and PTV60Gy volume were important factors for severe WL. Conclusions: Reducing the PTV60Gy volume can be useful in reducing severe WL. Because the clinical significance of IRPTV is unclear, the omission of IRPTV should be considered while balancing risks and benefits.

Indexed as

head and neckintensity-modulated radiation therapyplanning target volumesquamous cell carcinomaweight loss

Identifiers

PMID39895954
PMCPMC11785378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.