Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39895924›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental hepatology

First Series of Living Donor Liver Retransplants From India: Challenges and Outcomes.

Shaleen Agarwal, Rajesh Dey, Sanjiv Saigal, Phani K Nekarakanti, Subash Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shaleen AgarwalCentre for Liver and Biliary Sciences, Max Superspeciality Hospital, Saket, Delhi, India.
Rajesh DeyCentre for Liver and Biliary Sciences, Max Superspeciality Hospital, Vaishali, UP, India.
Sanjiv SaigalCentre for Liver and Biliary Sciences, Max Superspeciality Hospital, Saket, Delhi, India.
Phani K NekarakantiCentre for Liver and Biliary Sciences, Max Superspeciality Hospital, Saket, Delhi, India.
Subash GuptaCentre for Liver and Biliary Sciences, Max Superspeciality Hospital, Saket, Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is a paucity of Indian data on long-term survival after living donor liver transplant (LDLT) or the need for retransplant (re-LT). In this article, we report the first series of retransplants from India with focus on indications, technical challenges and results. Methods: A retrospective study on 29 patients undergoing a liver retransplant (re-LT) was analysed with respect to survival outcomes and postoperative complications. Patients were divided into early and late retransplant groups based on whether re-LT was performed within or beyond 30 days of primary transplant. Results: Liver retransplant was performed in 29 (0.81%) patients out of a total of 3563 liver transplants (28 living donor and one deceased donor liver transplant). The primary transplant was an LDLT in 27 (93%) patients. Retransplant was performed at a median of 26 days after the first transplant. Re-LT was performed early (within 30 days) in 17 (59%) patients and late (beyond 30 days) in 12 (41%). Hepatic artery thrombosis (53%) and early graft dysfunction (47%) were the indications for early retransplant, while biliary complications (50%) and chronic rejection (33%) were primary indications for late retransplant. Postretransplant complications occurred in 22 (75%) patients, the commonest being gram-negative bacterial sepsis. The 30-day mortality after retransplant was 27% (8/29). The primary cause of mortality was gram-negative septicaemia. The mortality in the late retransplant group (2, 16.6%) was lower than in the early retransplant group (6, 35%). Conclusion: Retransplant using living donors is a viable option in properly selected patients with prior LDLT.

Indexed as

chronic rejectionhepatic artery thrombosisliver retransplantliving donor transplant

Identifiers

PMID39895924
PMCPMC11786199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.