ReviewJournal of cardiovascular echography
Noninvasive Estimation of Right Atrial, Right Ventricular, and Pulmonary Systolic Pressure: "A Good Story Never Ends".
Review in Journal of cardiovascular echography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- How to Do Echo for Noninvasive Hemodynamic Evaluation of the Patient in the Intensive Care Unit: A Consensus Statement of the Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging.Journal of cardiovascular echographyArticle
- Unlocking the Prognostic Potential of Right Ventricular Strain in Heart Failure Subtypes.Journal of cardiovascular echographyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The precise evaluation of pulmonary artery, right atrial, and ventricular pressures is essential for the diagnosis, ongoing management, and therapeutic decision-making in a wide range of cardiovascular conditions, including pulmonary hypertension. Since the early 1980s, the accuracy and consistency of echocardiography in estimating pulmonary artery pressure have been a subject of debate, with multiple formulas developed over time to improve reliability. Despite initial concerns, echocardiography has now been widely accepted as a noninvasive, safe, and readily available alternative to the more invasive right heart catheterization, which remains the gold standard. The growing recognition of echocardiography's role in clinical practice has led to significant advancements in its methodology. This review explores the contribution of echo-Doppler techniques to the assessment of right heart hemodynamics, highlighting their importance in daily practice. It also examines the historical milestones that have facilitated the standardization of various formulas and paved the way for the development of current guidelines. By tracing these developments, the review underscores the relevance of echocardiography in modern cardiology and the importance of continuing to refine its application to ensure accurate and reliable assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.