ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2025
Respiratory-gated micro-computed tomography imaging to measure radiation-induced lung injuries in mice following ultra-high dose-rate and conventional dose-rate radiation therapy.
Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing the sparing effect of FLASH-RT: From phenomenon observation, radiophysical determinants to molecular mechanisms and synergistic strategies.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Towards FLASH Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer: A Review on Preclinical Evidence and Technical Feasibility.Cancers · 2026Review
- Multidimensional lung imaging: integrated preclinical platforms enabling the identification of translational biomarkers for pulmonary research.Respiratory research · 2026Review
- FLASH Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer: Translational Mechanisms, Preclinical Evidence, and Barriers.Cureus · 2026Review
- Resolution-noise characteristics of common FDK filter kernels: A practical reference for preclinical cone-beam micro-CT.PloS one · 2026Article
- Factors Influencing the Biological Effects of FLASH Irradiation.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Effects and potential mechanisms of the ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy on lung injury: a review.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
- Dosimetric characterization of a novel UHDR megavoltage X-ray source for FLASH radiobiological experiments.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Ultra-high dose-rate radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) shows the potential to eliminate tumors while sparing healthy tissues. To investigate radiation-induced lung damage, we used Approach: Thirty healthy male C57BL/6 mice received baseline micro-CT scans followed by radiation therapy targeting the thorax. Treatments administered included no irradiation, 10-MV photon FLASH-RT, and 10-MV conventional RT with either 15 or 30 Gy prescribed dose. Follow-up micro-CT scans were obtained up to 24 weeks post-irradiation, and histology was obtained at the experimental endpoint. Lung volume and CT number were measured during peak inspiration and end-expiration and used to calculate the functional residual capacity (FRC) and tidal volume ( Results: Radiation pneumonitis was observed sporadically in micro-CT images at 9 and 12 weeks post-irradiation. Fibrosis was observed in the endpoint images and confirmed with histology. Compared with the 15-Gy treatment groups and unirradiated controls, the micro-CT images for 30-Gy FLASH-RT showed differences during peak inspiration, with a significant reduction in Conclusions: Respiratory-gated micro-CT imaging was sensitive to radiation pneumonitis and fibrosis. Significant differences were seen in functional metrics measured at the endpoint for FRC (both 30-Gy groups) and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.