Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39895733›Full record

ArticleACS omega2025

Quencher-Free Fluorescence Monitoring of G-Quadruplex Folding.

Zachary Parada, Tanner G Hoog, Katarzyna P Adamala, Aaron E Engelhart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zachary ParadaDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, 321 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7877-3017
Tanner G HoogDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, 6-160 Jackson Hall, 321 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.
Katarzyna P AdamalaDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, 321 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1066-7207
Aaron E EngelhartDepartment of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Biophysics, University of Minnesota, 321 Church Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1849-7700

Funding

Development of new tags for RNA visualizationR01GM152459 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Aaron E. Engelhart · 2024 to 2026
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM152459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guanine-rich sequences exhibit a high degree of polymorphism and can form single-stranded, Watson-Crick duplex, and four-stranded G-quadruplex structures. These sequences have found a wide range of uses in synthetic biology applications, arising in part from their structural plasticity. High-throughput, low-cost tools for monitoring the folding and unfolding transitions of G-rich sequences would provide an enabling technology for accelerating the prototyping of synthetic biological systems and for accelerating design-build-test cycles. Here, we show that unfolding transitions of a range of G-quadruplex-forming DNA sequences can be monitored in a FRET-like format using DNA sequences that possess only a single dye label, with no quencher. These quencher-free assays can be performed at low cost, with both cost and lead times ca. 1 order of magnitude lower than FRET-labeled strands. Thus, quencher-free secondary structure monitoring promises to be a valuable tool for the testing and development of synthetic biology systems employing G-quadruplexes.

Identifiers

PMID39895733
PMCPMC11780409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.