ArticleJournal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects2024
Determination of cervical vertebral maturation using machine learning in lateral cephalograms.
Article in Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The accurate timing of growth modification treatments is crucial for optimal results in orthodontics. However, traditional methods for assessing growth status, such as hand-wrist radiographs and subjective interpretation of lateral cephalograms, have limitations. This study aimed to develop a semi-automated approach using machine learning based on cervical vertebral dimensions (CVD) for determining skeletal maturation status. Methods: A dataset comprising 980 lateral cephalograms was collected from the Department of Orthodontics, Shahid Beheshti Dental School in Tehran, Iran. Eight landmarks representing the corners of the third and fourth cervical vertebrae were selected. A ratio-based approach was employed to compute the values of C3 and C4, accompanied by the implementation of an auto_error_reduction (AER) function to enhance the accuracy of landmark selection. Linear distances and ratios were measured using the dedicated software. A novel data augmentation technique was applied to expand the dataset. Subsequently, a stacking model was developed, trained on the augmented dataset, and evaluated using a separate test set of 196 cephalograms. Results: The proposed model achieved an accuracy of 99.49% and demonstrated a loss of 0.003 on the test set. Conclusion: By employing feature engineering, simplified landmark selection, AER function, data augmentation, and eliminating gender and age features, a model was developed for accurate assessment of skeletal maturation for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.