Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39895569›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2025

Comparison of Urinary Red Blood Cell Distribution (URD) and Dysmorphic Red Blood Cells for Detecting Glomerular Hematuria: A Multicenter Study.

A-Jin Lee, Hae In Bang, Sun Min Lee, Dongil Won, Myung Seo Kang, Hyun-Ji Choi, In Hee Lee, Chang-Ho Jeon

Abstract readMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A-Jin LeeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8298-1652
Hae In BangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7854-3011
Sun Min LeeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8438-3365
Dongil WonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1983-2515
Myung Seo KangDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7074-2665
Hyun-Ji ChoiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Pusan, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6453-7099
In Hee LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3562-7586
Chang-Ho JeonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7450-7117

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe clinical utility of urinary red blood cell (RBC) distribution (URD) remains limited. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of URD and dysmorphic RBC (dRBC) in a multicenter study.

methodsThis study enrolled 703 patients who visited four tertiary medical centers in Korea. Patients were classified into glomerular diseases with biopsy (N = 169), renal diseases including chronic kidney disease (N = 194), nephrotic syndrome (NS; N = 88), tubulointerstitial diseases (N = 36), acute kidney injury (N = 32), others (N = 10), and extrarenal diseases (N = 174). Renal parameters, urine microscopic examination, urinalysis, and URD assessments were conducted. The diagnostic performances of dRBC and URD were evaluated.

resultsMedian values of both dRBC and URD were significantly elevated in patients with glomerular diseases. URD exhibited a significant correlation with dRBC (r = 0.536) and albumin creatinine ratio (r = 0.186), while no significant correlation was observed with specific gravity (r = -0.03). Among renal diseases, dRBC and URD values were notably higher in patients with NS. The agreement rate between dRBC and URD results was 78.3% (112/143), with 31 instances showing discrepancies. ROC curve analysis comparing glomerular and extrarenal diseases yielded cutoff values of 18% for dRBC and 31.9% for URD, resulting in corresponding areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.79 and 0.83, respectively.

conclusionsURD exhibited a comparable diagnostic performance, as indicated by a similar AUC value to that of dRBC, while offering the added advantage of providing objective and standardizable results. This attribute enhances its utility as a parameter for distinguishing between patients with glomerular hematuria (GH) and those with non-GH.

Indexed as

ErythrocytesErythrocytes, AbnormalHematuriaAdultAgedFemaleHumansKidney GlomerulusMaleMiddle AgedROC CurveUrinalysisYoung Adultdysmorphic red blood cellglomerulonephritishematuriaurinary red blood cell distribution

Identifiers

PMID39895569
PMCPMC11904819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.