Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39895480›Full record

ArticleItalian journal of food safety2024

Microbial evaluation of wild boar carcasses coming from control culling in the subalpine Prealpi Orobie area, northern Italy.

Simone Stella, Giacomo Ghislanzoni, Gualtiero Borella, Massimo Zanutto, Daniela Longhi, Cristian Bernardi, Erica Tirloni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Italian journal of food safety, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Simone StellaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Milan, Lodi. simone.stella@unimi.it.
Giacomo GhislanzoniFreelance veterinarian, Lecco. giacomoghisla93@gmail.com.
Gualtiero BorellaHealth Protection Agency, Bergamo. GUALTIERO.BORELLA@ats-bg.it.
Massimo ZanuttoHealth Protection Agency, Bergamo. massimo.zanutto@ats-bg.it.
Daniela LonghiHealth Protection Agency Brianza, Lecco. daniela.longhi@ats-brianza.it.
Cristian BernardiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Milan, Lodi. cristian.bernardi@unimi.it.
Erica TirloniDepartment of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Milan, Lodi. erica.tirloni@unimi.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study tested 32 carcasses of control-culled wild boars in a subalpine area of Northern Italy between May and November 2021, delivered to three approved game meat establishments. Carcasses and organs were submitted to the detection of Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp., Listeria spp., and Listeria monocytogenes; carcass surfaces were also sampled for microbial counts [total viable count (TVC), Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia coli, coagulase-positive Staphylococci]. Campylobacter spp. was detected with high prevalence (90.9%) in the caecum as well as Listeria spp. and L. monocytogenes (37.5% and 25%, respectively), whereas only one animal harbored Salmonella spp. (3.8%). A low contamination rate was detected on the carcasses for Campylobacter spp. and Listeria spp. High mean TVC, Enterobacteriaceae, and E. coli counts were detected on the carcasses (5.90, 4.83 and 2.54 Log CFU/cm2, respectively). Animal sex and weight exerted a weak effect on bacterial counts; the same was observed for the culling/sampling interval. Moderately higher counts were detected in animals culled with high (>15°C) environmental temperatures. Animals shot in the abdomen showed higher counts for all the parameters except for Staphylococci, and an increasing count of enteric bacteria was observed when considering head/neck, shoulder, chest, and abdomen locations. A significant difference among the plants was observed, independently from the other factors, thus stressing the importance of the application of hygiene procedures in approved game meat establishments to limit carcass contamination.

Identifiers

PMID39895480
PMCPMC11788887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.