Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39895266›Full record

ArticleThe Permanente journal2025

A Challenging Case of Eosinophilic Fasciitis Without Classic Histopathological Findings.

Cristo Armando Carrasco Mendoza, Alexander Rolando Gomez-Lara, Brian Matthew Kleker

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The Permanente journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cristo Armando Carrasco MendozaKaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-8105-9297
Alexander Rolando Gomez-LaraKaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-9919-412X
Brian Matthew KlekerDepartment of Dermatology, La Mesa Medical Offices, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, La Mesa, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) is a rare dermatologic disease with clinical similarities to localized scleroderma and systemic sclerosis (SSc). Diagnosing EF is challenging due to overlapping clinical features among these conditions. Differentiating EF from localized scleroderma and SSc can be aided by laboratory tests, histopathological examination, and imaging studies. The diagnosis of EF specifically requires the exclusion of SSc and typically requires magnetic resonance imaging or en bloc fascial biopsy of affected areas. Here, the authors present a 75-year-old woman with a painful, violaceous rash on the legs and abdomen, leg swelling, and tightness around her upper abdomen. Review of systems revealed decreased appetite, unintentional weight loss, and shortness of breath on exertion. Physical examination showed a faint violaceous rash on the abdomen and legs as well as abdominal distention. The patient's clinical picture was complicated by worsening of the rash, development of chronic cough, continued unintentional weight loss, decreased appetite, early satiety, dry eyes, and dry mouth. An autoimmune process was considered, and the patient was seen by rheumatology, where an appropriate workup excluded localized scleroderma and SSc. EF was suspected and supported by magnetic resonance imaging findings showing fascial edema. En bloc fascial biopsy of the right thigh did not reveal classic EF findings.

Indexed as

EosinophiliaFasciitisAgedBiopsyDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingScleroderma, LocalizedScleroderma, Systemiceosinophilic fasciitislocalized sclerodermamorpheasystemic sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID39895266
PMCPMC11907669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.