ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025
Reaching Distance Influences Perceptual Decisions.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Decision making is an integral part of everyday life. Recently, there has been a growing interest in the potential influence of action on perceptual decisions, following ideas of embodied decision making. Studies examining decisions regarding the direction of noisy visual motion have found a bias towards the least effortful response option in experiments in which the differences in motor costs associated with alternative response actions were implicit, but not in an experiment in which these differences were made explicit. It remains unclear whether the biasing effect generalizes to other perceptual tasks than motion perception and whether consciously experiencing motor costs prevents such biases. To test the generalizability of effects across perceptual tasks, we used a within-subjects design where 24 participants performed both a motion discrimination task and an orientation discrimination task. Motor costs were manipulated by presenting response buttons for the two alternative choices at different reaching distances. By varying distances randomly, we avoided implicit biases linked to specific decisions. Our findings revealed a bias towards closer response options in both tasks, indicating that explicit information of motor costs significantly impacts perceptual decisions beyond motion discrimination. Contrary to prevailing theories that consider the motor system as a mere effector of the decision, our study implies that the actions that are associated with the response options influence the decision process itself.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.