Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39895214›Full record

ArticleJournal of microscopy2025

TUNA-EBSD-CL correlative multi-microscopy study, on the example of Cu(In,Ga)S

Yucheng Hu, Gunnar Kusch, Damilola Adeleye, Susanne Siebentritt, Rachel Oliver

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Loss Analysis of Low Bandgap (Ag,Cu)(In,Ga)SeSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yucheng HuDepartment of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0888-0299
Gunnar KuschDepartment of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Damilola AdeleyeLaboratory for Photovoltaics, Department of Physics and Materials Science Research Unit, University of Luxembourg, Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Susanne SiebentrittLaboratory for Photovoltaics, Department of Physics and Materials Science Research Unit, University of Luxembourg, Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Rachel OliverDepartment of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

EPSRC EP/R025193/1EPSRC EP/V029231/1Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg PRIDE 15/10935404Henry Royce Institute EP/P024947/1Henry Royce Institute EP/R00661X/1REACH INTER/UKRI/20/15050982
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-microscopy offers significant benefits to the understanding of complex materials behaviour by providing complementary information from different properties. However, some characterisations may strongly influence other measurements in the same workflow. To acquire reliable and valid datasets, optimising multi-microscopy procedure is necessary. In present work, we studied the influence of the measurement order on the quality of multi-microscopy datasets. Multi-microscopy incorporating tunnelling current AFM (TUNA), electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD), and cathodoluminescence (CL) on a polycrystalline solar cell absorber, Cu(In,Ga)S

Indexed as

cathodoluminescenceconductive‐AFMelectron backscatter diffractiongrain boundarysolar cell

Identifiers

PMID39895214
PMCPMC11891954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.