Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39895120›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2025

Force-Field Benchmark for Polydimethylsiloxane: Density, Heat Capacity, Isothermal Compressibility, Viscosity and Thermal Conductivity.

Zhirui Xiang, Chao Gao, Teng Long, Lifeng Ding, Tianhang Zhou, Zhenghao Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhirui XiangDepartment of Chemistry and Materials Science, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu, P. R. China.
Chao GaoAerospace Research Institute of Materials & Processing Technology, Beijing 100076, P. R. China.
Teng LongSchool of Materials Science & Engineering, Shandong University, Jingshi Road, 17923 Jinan, Shandong, China.
Lifeng DingDepartment of Chemistry and Materials Science, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0001-8761-191X
Tianhang ZhouCollege of Carbon Neutrality Future Technology, State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Beijing 102249, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0002-4007-9935
Zhenghao WuDepartment of Chemistry and Materials Science, Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University, Suzhou 215123, Jiangsu, P. R. China.ORCID 0000-0003-2862-4432

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polysiloxanes are versatile polymeric materials with widespread applications in industries ranging from electronics to biomedical devices because of their unique thermal and viscoelastic properties. Accurate molecular simulations of polysiloxanes are essential for understanding their broad applications from a microscopic perspective. However, the accuracy of these simulations is highly dependent on the quality of the force fields used. In this work, we present a comprehensive benchmark and development of force fields tailored for polydimethylsiloxane, which is one of the most widely used polysiloxane materials. Our focus is on their performance in predicting key thermophysical properties including density, heat capacities, isothermal compressibility, and transport properties such as viscosity and thermal conductivity. Experimental measurements are performed in parallel to rigorously validate simulation outcomes. Existing force fields for polydimethylsiloxane, including those derived for organic and inorganic systems, are systematically evaluated against experimental data to identify limitations in accuracy and transferability. Simulation results are compared extensively with experimental observations across a range of temperatures and pressures, revealing the strengths and shortcomings of these commonly utilized force fields for polydimethylsiloxane. Discrepancies between force field predictions and experimental measurements are analyzed in detail for thermodynamic and transport properties of polydimethylsiloxane. This benchmark study serves as a critical assessment of current force fields for polydimethylsiloxane and offers guidelines for their further development, enabling more reliable simulations of polysiloxane-based materials for various industrial applications.

Identifiers

PMID39895120
PMCPMC11831649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.