ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2025
Force-Field Benchmark for Polydimethylsiloxane: Density, Heat Capacity, Isothermal Compressibility, Viscosity and Thermal Conductivity.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Molecular Weight Effect of Poly(dimethylsiloxane) on Its Interfaces with Water and Octane: A Molecular Dynamics Simulation Approach.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Atomistic Polymer Modeling: Recent Advances and Challenges in Building and Parametrization Workflows.Macromolecules · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polysiloxanes are versatile polymeric materials with widespread applications in industries ranging from electronics to biomedical devices because of their unique thermal and viscoelastic properties. Accurate molecular simulations of polysiloxanes are essential for understanding their broad applications from a microscopic perspective. However, the accuracy of these simulations is highly dependent on the quality of the force fields used. In this work, we present a comprehensive benchmark and development of force fields tailored for polydimethylsiloxane, which is one of the most widely used polysiloxane materials. Our focus is on their performance in predicting key thermophysical properties including density, heat capacities, isothermal compressibility, and transport properties such as viscosity and thermal conductivity. Experimental measurements are performed in parallel to rigorously validate simulation outcomes. Existing force fields for polydimethylsiloxane, including those derived for organic and inorganic systems, are systematically evaluated against experimental data to identify limitations in accuracy and transferability. Simulation results are compared extensively with experimental observations across a range of temperatures and pressures, revealing the strengths and shortcomings of these commonly utilized force fields for polydimethylsiloxane. Discrepancies between force field predictions and experimental measurements are analyzed in detail for thermodynamic and transport properties of polydimethylsiloxane. This benchmark study serves as a critical assessment of current force fields for polydimethylsiloxane and offers guidelines for their further development, enabling more reliable simulations of polysiloxane-based materials for various industrial applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.