Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39895101›Full record

Observational studyJMIR formative research2025

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Delirium and Risk Factor Identification in Intensive Care Unit Patients With Burns: Retrospective Observational Study.

Ryo Esumi, Hiroki Funao, Eiji Kawamoto, Ryota Sakamoto, Asami Ito-Masui, Fumito Okuno, Toru Shinkai, Atsuya Hane, Kaoru Ikejiri, Yuichi Akama and 5 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. [Current applications and prospects of artificial intelligence in burn diagnosis and treatment].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ryo Esumi *Department of Molecular Pathobiology and Cell Adhesion Biology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4954-9750
Hiroki Funao *Department of Practical Nursing, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu city, Japan.ORCID 0009-0009-4784-2540
Eiji KawamotoDepartment of Molecular Pathobiology and Cell Adhesion Biology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3920-9939
Ryota SakamotoDepartment of Medical Informatics, Mie University Hospital, Tsu city, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0411-856X
Asami Ito-MasuiDepartment of Molecular Pathobiology and Cell Adhesion Biology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2086-4231
Fumito OkunoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Center, Mie University Hospital, Tsu city, Japan.ORCID 0009-0004-5158-6184
Toru ShinkaiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Center, Mie University Hospital, Tsu city, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9474-1541
Atsuya HaneDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Center, Mie University Hospital, Tsu city, Japan.ORCID 0009-0007-1299-8073
Kaoru IkejiriDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Center, Mie University Hospital, Tsu city, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0801-9457
Yuichi AkamaDepartment of Molecular Pathobiology and Cell Adhesion Biology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7040-1307
Arong GaowaDepartment of Molecular Pathobiology and Cell Adhesion Biology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0127-2369
Eun Jeong ParkDepartment of Molecular Pathobiology and Cell Adhesion Biology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4288-5893
Ryo MomosakiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu city, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3274-3952
Ryuji KakuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu city, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-2555-5841
Motomu ShimaokaDepartment of Molecular Pathobiology and Cell Adhesion Biology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie University, Tsu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1930-3397

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of delirium in patients with burns receiving treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) is high, reaching up to 77%, and has been associated with increased mortality rates. Therefore, early identification of patients at high risk of delirium onset is essential for improving treatment strategies.

objectiveThis study aimed to create a machine learning model for predicting delirium in patients with burns during their ICU stay using patient data from the first day of ICU admission and identify predictive factors for ICU delirium in patients with burns.

methodsThis study focused on 82 patients with burns aged ≥18 years who were admitted to the ICU at Mie University Hospital for ≥24 hours between January 2015 and June 2023. In total, 70 variables were measured in patients upon ICU admission and used as explanatory variables in the ICU delirium prediction model. Delirium was assessed using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist every 8 hours after ICU admission. A total of 10 different machine learning methods were used to predict ICU delirium. Multiple receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted for various machine learning models, and the area under the curve (AUC) for each was compared. In addition, the top 15 risk factors contributing to delirium onset were identified using Shapley additive explanations analysis.

resultsAmong the 10 machine learning models tested, logistic regression (mean AUC 0.906, SD 0.073), support vector machine (mean AUC 0.897, SD 0.056), k-nearest neighbor (mean AUC 0.894, SD 0.060), neural network (mean AUC 0.857, SD 0.058), random forest (mean AUC 0.850, SD 0.074), adaptive boosting (mean AUC 0.832, SD 0.094), gradient boosting machine (mean AUC 0.821, SD 0.074), and naïve Bayes (mean AUC 0.827, SD 0.095) demonstrated the highest accuracy in predicting ICU delirium. Specifically, 24-hour urine output (from ICU admission to 24 hours), oxygen saturation, burn area, total bilirubin level, and intubation upon ICU admission were identified as the major risk factors for delirium onset. In addition, variables, such as the proportion of white blood cell fractions, including monocytes; methemoglobin concentration; and respiratory rate, were identified as important risk factors for ICU delirium.

conclusionsThis study demonstrated the ability of machine learning models trained using vital signs and blood data upon ICU admission to predict delirium in patients with burns during their ICU stay.

Indexed as

BurnsDeliriumMachine LearningAdultAgedFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC CurveAIartificial intelligenceburnsdeliriumintensive care unitmachine learningprediction model

Identifiers

PMID39895101
PMCPMC11923481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.