Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39895048›Full record

ArticleArthritis care & research2025

Pregnancy Outcomes of Targeted Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Among Patients With Autoimmune Diseases: A Scoping Review.

Vienna Cheng, Neda Amiri, Vicki Cheng, Ursula Ellis, Jacquelyn J Cragg, Mark Harrison, Laurie Proulx, Mary A De Vera

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis care & research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vienna ChengUniversity of British Columbia, Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, and Arthritis Research Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0009-0009-7053-559X
Neda AmiriUniversity of British Columbia, Arthritis Research Canada, and Mary Pack Arthritis Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2185-3347
Vicki ChengUniversity of British Columbia and Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5030-9135
Ursula EllisUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5896-4852
Jacquelyn J CraggUniversity of British Columbia, Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, and International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6284-938X
Mark HarrisonUniversity of British Columbia, Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Arthritis Research Canada, and Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2115-2447
Laurie ProulxCanadian Arthritis Patient Alliance, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Mary A De VeraUniversity of British Columbia, Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Arthritis Research Canada, and Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2205-2683

Funding

The Arthritis Society SOG-22-192
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTargeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (tsDMARDs) have expanded the management of autoimmune diseases, including rheumatic diseases. As the use of these drugs grows, it is important to understand their effects on pregnancy. We conducted a scoping review to synthesize the current evidence on the impacts of tsDMARDs on pregnancy outcomes.

methodsWe searched the Embase, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases in November 2023. We included studies that examined tsDMARD exposure for chronic autoimmune disease(s), particularly in mothers during pregnancy, fathers before conception, and/or fetuses/neonates in utero. We extracted data on sample size, study design, tsDMARD exposure (dose and duration), and reproductive health outcomes.

resultsOf 6,712 studies screened, eight were included, namely nine case reports, one case series, four cross-sectional studies, and one cohort study among patients with ulcerative colitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and psoriasis. Sample sizes ranged from 1 to 116 pregnancies or offspring, with six studies on tofacitinib, one on baricitinib, one on upadacitinib, and no studies on apremilast. Overall, 19 fetal/neonatal outcomes, six fetal/neonatal-maternal outcomes, and three maternal outcomes were extracted. The most frequently reported fetal/neonatal outcomes were congenital anomaly (n = 4), preterm birth (n = 4), and the fetal/neonatal-maternal outcome of spontaneous abortion (n = 4). Only one study reported on the maternal outcome of delivery via Cesarean section.

conclusionOur scoping review of evidence to date on the perinatal use of tsDMARDs reveal small sample sizes and a limited number of studies, all largely descriptive in nature. Findings highlight evidence gaps that preclude providers and patients from making informed decisions when considering the perinatal use of tsDMARDs.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsAutoimmune DiseasesPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomeFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyAntirheumatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID39895048
PMCPMC12209491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.