Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39895022›Full record

ArticleMolecular plant pathology2025

Non-Invasive, Bioluminescence-Based Visualisation and Quantification of Bacterial Infections in Arabidopsis Over Time.

Nanne W Taks, Mathijs D Batstra, Ronald F Kortekaas, Floris D Stevens, Sebastian Pfeilmeier, Harrold A van den Burg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular plant pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nanne W TaksMolecular Plant Pathology, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4092-3021
Mathijs D BatstraTechnology Center FNWI, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Ronald F KortekaasTechnology Center FNWI, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Floris D StevensMolecular Plant Pathology, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Sebastian PfeilmeierMolecular Plant Pathology, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8951-6163
Harrold A van den BurgMolecular Plant Pathology, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4142-374X

Funding

Bejo Zaden B.V.NWO OCENW.XS24.1.155Rijk ZwaanTopsector T&U EZ-2012-02Topsector T&U TU18024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant-pathogenic bacteria colonise their hosts using various strategies, exploiting both natural openings and wounds in leaves and roots. The vascular pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) enters its host through hydathodes, organs at the leaf margin involved in guttation. Subsequently, Xcc breaches the hydathode-xylem barrier and progresses into the xylem vessels causing systemic disease. To elucidate the mechanisms that underpin the different stages of an Xcc infection, a need exists to image bacterial progression in planta in a non-invasive manner. Here, we describe a phenotyping setup and Python image analysis pipeline for capturing 16 independent Xcc infections in Arabidopsis thaliana plants in parallel over time. The setup combines an RGB camera for imaging disease symptoms and an ultrasensitive CCD camera for monitoring bacterial progression inside leaves using bioluminescence. The method reliably quantified bacterial growth in planta for two bacterial species, that is, vascular Xcc and the mesophyll pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst). The camera resolution allowed Xcc imaging already in the hydathodes, yielding reproducible data for the first stages prior to the systemic infection. Data obtained through the image analysis pipeline was robust and validated findings from other bioluminescence imaging methods, while requiring fewer samples. Moreover, bioluminescence was reliably detected within 5 min, offering a significant time advantage over our previously reported method with light-sensitive films. Thus, this method is suitable to quantify the resistance level of a large number of Arabidopsis thaliana accessions and mutant lines to different bacterial strains in a non-invasive manner for phenotypic screenings.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisLuminescent MeasurementsPlant DiseasesXanthomonas campestrisPlant LeavesPseudomonas syringaeTime FactorsArabidopsis thalianaautomated image analysisbioluminescencenon‐invasive phenotypingphytopathogenic bacteriaplant resistanceXanthomonas campestris

Identifiers

PMID39895022
PMCPMC11788312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.