ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2025
Finite element stress analysis of the hindfoot after medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy with different translation distances.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The medial displacement calcaneal osteotomy (MDCO) is one of commonly used procedures to restore the hindfoot alignment of the flatfoot deformity. However, the selection of the amount of translation for MDCO and its biomechanical effect on the hindfoot was rarely reported. This study employs finite element analysis to investigate stress distribution in the hindfoot following MDCO across varying translation distances. An adult-acquired flatfoot deformity (AAFD) finite element (FE) model consisting of 16 bones, 56 ligaments, and soft tissues was used. MDCO procedure was simulated with the translation distance of 0 mm, 2 mm, 4 mm, 6 mm, 8 mm, 10 mm, 12 mm, and 14 mm. Contact pressure on the plantar surface, the articular surface of the tibiotalar joint and the subtalar joint, and von Mises stress on the resection surface of the calcaneus under different translation distances were analyzed and compared. Results showed the MDCO reduces 12.46 to 33.32% peak contact pressure on the plantar surface, the tibiotalar joint, and the posterior facet of the subtalar joint, and shifts pressure from lateral to medial. But the difference in peak pressure for different translation distances larger than 4 mm was small. The MDCO also reduces the stress on the distal calcaneal resected surface. The study highlights the use of patient-specific computational modeling for preoperative plans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39894893What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.