Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39894835›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2025

The effect of cigarette smoking and heated tobacco products on different denture materials; an in vitro study.

Sara F El Shafei, Ayman H Amin, Eman G Abdelghaffar, Sara Moataz, Fatma Makkeyah, Mohamed Shamel, Mahmoud Al Ankily

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sara F El ShafeiFaculty of Dentistry, The British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt. sara.fikry@bue.edu.eg.
Ayman H AminFaculty of Dentistry, The British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt.
Eman G AbdelghaffarFaculty of Dentistry, The British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt.
Sara MoatazFaculty of Dentistry, The British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt.
Fatma MakkeyahFixed Prosthodontics Department, Faculty of Dentistry, The British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed ShamelOral Biology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, The British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt.
Mahmoud Al AnkilyOral Biology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, The British University in Egypt, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study compares the effect of conventional cigarette smoke versus heated tobacco on the discoloration, surface roughness, and bacterial colonization of different oral prosthesis materials. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of one hundred and twenty disc-shaped samples made of four different denture base materials were prepared to represent different denture bases to assess the surface roughness and biofilm formation; group (CA): conventional heat-cured acrylic resin (Acrostone, Egypt), group (FA): flexible acrylic resin (Valplast International Corp, USA), group (TA): heat-cured acrylic resin reinforced with titanium nanoparticles (TA nanoparticles, Nanogate, Egypt), and group (PA): 3D printed acrylic resin (Nexdent, The Netherlands). Another sixty samples of artificial and 3D printed teeth were used to assess the color change: conventional ready-made acrylic resin teeth (Acrostone, Egypt) and 3D-printed acrylic resin teeth (Nexdent, The Netherlands). Each group was further divided according to the smoking method into three subgroups (n = 10): the no-smoking exposure group (C), the conventional smoking exposure group (CS), and the heated tobacco exposure group (HT). A custom-made smoking device was used to perform the experiment. Six hundred cigarettes/heets representing 30 days of medium smoking behavior (20 cigarettes/day) were used. The surface roughness of the disc-shaped samples was measured before and after the experiment using the JITAI8101 surface roughness tester (Beijing Jitai Tech Detection Device Co., Ltd, China), and the color parameters were assessed before and after the experiment using VITA Easyshade Advance 4.01 (VITA shade, VITA made, VITA).

resultsThe results showed that both conventional cigarette smoking and heated tobacco increased the surface roughness of the denture base disc samples. This change was statistically significant in all sample groups. Bacterial accumulation was also increased in all four denture base sample groups, with the heated tobacco causing greater bacterial accumulation than conventional cigarette smoke. Regarding the color change, conventional smoking caused a more significant color change than heated tobacco for both types of teeth used.

conclusionBoth conventional smoke and heated tobacco affect dental materials adversely. Conventional cigarette smoking caused greater surface roughness and discoloration of the samples, while heated tobacco resulted in greater bacterial accumulation of study materials. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Increase dentists' and patients' awareness of the effects of different types of smoke.

Indexed as

Cigarette SmokingDental MaterialsDenture BasesHot TemperatureSmokeTobacco ProductsAcrylic ResinsBiofilmsColorHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMaterials TestingSurface PropertiesTitaniumTooth, ArtificialAcrylic ResinsDental MaterialsSmokeTitaniumAcrylic resinsBiofilmCigarette smokingDenture basesTobacco products

Identifiers

PMID39894835
PMCPMC11789351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.