Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39894804›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic delivery2025

Comparative in-vitro and in-vivo evaluation of spherulites and cubosomes of Irinotecan for lung targeting.

Jatin Rawat, Ravikumar Kachhadiya, Hetal Thakkar

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic delivery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jatin RawatCentre for Relevance and Excellence in Novel drug delivery systems, Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Fatehgunj, Vadodara, India.
Ravikumar KachhadiyaCentre for Relevance and Excellence in Novel drug delivery systems, Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Fatehgunj, Vadodara, India.ORCID 0009-0007-5935-585X
Hetal ThakkarCentre for Relevance and Excellence in Novel drug delivery systems, Pharmacy Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Fatehgunj, Vadodara, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4825-9543

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe present investigation aimed at the comparative evaluation of the developed nanocarriers, viz. spherulites and cubosomes for lung targeting. MATERIALS AND

methodsBoth the spherulites and cubosomes were characterized for their entrapment efficiency, drug loading, size and zeta potential, in-vitro drug release profile, surface morphology, hemocompatibility, and in-vivo pharmacokinetic and lung biodistribution. RESULTS AND

conclusionsThe optimized batches of spherulites and cubosomes possessed high entrapment efficiency and drug loading with size around 200 nm, which is suitable for lung targeting. The zeta potential value for both the nanoformulations was found to be between -20 and -30 mv indicating the physical stability against aggregation. The SEM and TEM analysis revealed the presence of spherical and discrete particles in both the types of nanocarriers. Water channels were observed in case of cubosomes. Spherulites and cubosomes showed pH-dependent drug release with lower release at physiological pH while higher release at the pH of the tumor microenvironment. Both spherulites and cubosomes exhibited highly significant increase in the half-life and mean residence time in the plasma. The prepared nanoformulations were hemocompatible and had higher lung targeting potential compared to the plain drug solution.

Indexed as

CamptothecinDrug CarriersLungNanoparticlesAnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsDrug LiberationHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationIrinotecanMaleParticle SizeRatsTissue DistributionCamptothecinDrug CarriersIrinotecanbiodistributioncubosomeshemocompatibilityIrinotecanlung targetingspherulites

Identifiers

PMID39894804
PMCPMC11970735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.