ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2025
Area socioeconomic inequality and suicide mortality: contrasting common measures using National Violent Death Reporting System and linked administrative data.
Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Area economic inequality may underlie social disparities in suicide mortality (SM). Differences in measuring inequality contribute to variability across empirical evidence. We contrasted common income measures-absolute poverty, Gini inequality index, Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE)-and examined their associations with age- and sex-standardized SM across 1381 US counties. We used the 2006-2019 National Violent Death Reporting System linked to 2006-2010 administrative data on socioeconomic factors and a Bayesian spatial multilevel approach. Compared to affluent areas, poorer areas had the highest relative risk (RR) of SM (ICE RR, 1.24; 95% credible interval [CI], 1.17-1.31; absolute poverty RR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.25-1.41). Gini inequality was not linearly associated with SM. Cross-classifying Gini × ICE showed that the highest-risk areas had concentrated poverty (ICE) but varying Gini inequality. These high-risk, poverty-segregated areas were more often medically underserved, had lower population density, and high unemployment. African American or Indigenous suicide decedents frequently resided in high inequality areas, while older, White decedents with military backgrounds more often resided in lower Gini areas. The choice of inequality measure can lead to varied conclusions about social disparities in SM. A comparative approach offers more nuanced understanding of underlying socioeconomic marginalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.