Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39894755›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2025

Estimating the observability of an outcome from an electronic health record data set using external data.

Mengying Yan, Hwanhee Hong, Jonathan Wilson, Benjamin A Goldstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mengying YanDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27705, United States.ORCID 0009-0000-5365-4778
Hwanhee HongDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27705, United States.
Jonathan WilsonDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27705, United States.
Benjamin A GoldsteinDepartment of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27705, United States.

Funding

Science CoreP2CHD065563 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Giovanna M Merli · 2015 to 2026
$5.7M
Predictive Analytics in Hemodialysis: Enabling Precision Care for Patient with ESKDR01DK123062 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDSTEIN, BENJAMIN ALAN · 2020 to 2023
$2.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD065563NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK123062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the key limitations of electronic health record (EHR) data is that not all health care encounters are observed. The degree to which patient information is captured is referred to as observability. Poor observability, particularly differential observability, can lead to biased estimates and inference. As such, understanding the degree of observability is important in EHR-based studies. In this study, we propose using external data with known observability to assess the degree of overall observability in EHRs. We also construct a test for differential observability in the target EHR data set. Using principles from the transportability literature, we show that we can use a balancing score-based weight to estimate the observability of our target outcome. We conduct a series of simulation experiments to understand the conditions under which data set features must be required to obtain proper inference. To illustrate this, we consider hospital readmissions among patients with end-stage renal disease as our outcome of interest. We use administrative claims data, where the outcome is fully observed, as our external data.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPatient ReadmissionHumansKidney Failure, Chronicalgorithmic biasdata qualityelectronic health recordsobservabilitytransportability

Identifiers

PMID39894755
PMCPMC13071720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.